Hah. In the AK hand I figured he'd be snap-calling most A hi hands if I bet a standard size and he might well vbet the turn wider than he did. Perhaps xb is better but thoughts on bet size if we do decide to bluff this?
Dunna, I'll take a look at the video if you repost the link.
@outatime:
H1 I don't like raising the flop, this nit's range is basically always OPs and clubs with overs when he continues. It turns your hand into a bluff. With that in mind, based on your line I'd jam the river.
H2 I think 25NL is where you need to stop using such exploitable bet sizing. If you bet normally and iso UTG then betting bigger is fine but with semi-reggish players in the pot I wouldn't.
H3 you have to iso bigger pre. 3bb+1 for a limper (and for me, +1bb for iso'ing OOP but that's more optional). Flop, turn should be sized bigger, river is a bit iffy as played, on first glance it looks like a pretty clear x/f.
I love 3-betting light, and getting a crazy image at the tables.
Just so you know from my perspective when grinding 5nl, so I think like assume good 10nl reg, average 25nl reg although maybe I'm modest, you are like one of the most profitable players I can play against because your ranges are so exploitable.
I've had multiple people with like 14% 3bets and it just makes my life so easy.
Just so you know from my perspective when grinding 5nl, so I think like assume good 10nl reg, average 25nl reg although maybe I'm modest, you are like one of the most profitable players I can play against because your ranges are so exploitable.
I've had multiple people with like 14% 3bets and it just makes my life so easy.
Yeah, there's probably no doubt that there are good players out there who know how to exploirt a 14% 3betting range.
At the same time though, at this low level, there's probably more bad than good players when it comes to adjusting. People adjust wrongly. His pocket 5's are a prime example of that.
Just so you know from my perspective when grinding 5nl, so I think like assume good 10nl reg, average 25nl reg although maybe I'm modest, you are like one of the most profitable players I can play against because your ranges are so exploitable.
I've had multiple people with like 14% 3bets and it just makes my life so easy.
14% isn't insane, 7-10% is probably standard and 14% isn't terrible if balanced a little.
Yeah, there's probably no doubt that there are good players out there who know how to exploirt a 14% 3betting range.
At the same time though, at this low level, there's probably more bad than good players when it comes to adjusting. People adjust wrongly. His pocket 5's are a prime example of that.
Not sure you got the point of my post. I'm not saying don't do it, I'm saying be aware of it's pitfalls. If you're going to do something you need to be aware of how it actually effects your range.
It's much easier to start finding solutions for potential problems before we have to deal with them than it is trying to create them as we play, as you can see from what you're doing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDefiniteArticle
14% isn't insane, 7-10% is probably standard and 14% isn't terrible if balanced a little.
Ye, but you can pretty much guarantee it won't be anywhere close to balanced. Although I do think them numbers are probably a little high.
Hah. In the AK hand I figured he'd be snap-calling most A hi hands if I bet a standard size and he might well vbet the turn wider than he did. Perhaps xb is better but thoughts on bet size if we do decide to bluff this?
well definitely don't bet turn and xb river. for the most part i check turn and river, although depending on your range it might be best for you to bluff this hand. if that's the case i think you should vbet 99+ and do so for 75% pot
well definitely don't bet turn and xb river. for the most part i check turn and river, although depending on your range it might be best for you to bluff this hand. if that's the case i think you should vbet 99+ and do so for 75% pot
Yeah, I'd prob be OBing QQ-TT here too - is that a mistake?
Happy to get it in ahead 3 way here. Lol at BBs hand. Not many hands on them at this point but they continued to swap small stacks back and forth with any high card or suited hand.
@ telford At 178 I think you're good to take a 10nl shot...Waiting until 200 would mean you feel that you need 40 BIs at your current stake before even taking a shot at 10nl? seems a bit too nitty imo. To each its own though.
Don't patronize me I noted above they were bad hands. I had reasoning for my plays, esp. against that villain.
edit: villain loves to double/triple with air, basically valuetowning himself... unless/until he hits random backdoor flush/ 2 outers. Then my plan goes to ****.
Sorry Dunna I got more than half way through and was keeping my notes in the reply box but my laptop restarted itself and I lost everything
Anyway, some hands from today. iPoker definitely fishy in the day.
1. UTG is a maniac, BTN is weak tight. Don't see BTN doing this without at least NFD. Think my flop squeeze was undersized but I was struggling to keep up with the action...
fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.12, BB raises to $0.20, Hero raises to $0.72, BB calls $0.52
Flop:($1.44, 2 players) 8 K K Hero bets $0.72, BB raises to $1.87 and is all-in, Hero calls $1.15
Turn:($5.18, 2 players) 2
River:($5.18, 2 players) 8
Spoiler:
Hero shows A K (Full House, Kings full of Eights) (Pre 75%, Flop 100%, Turn 100%) BB shows A 9 (Two Pair, Kings and Eights) (Pre 25%, Flop 0%, Turn 0%) Hero wins $4.84
4. Mr. Weak Tight again. Didn't really expect him to fold to a cbet if he called pre, his ftcb was very low. Wasn't really sure what to do on flop and turn tbh. Check it down? Called the turn bet because it seemed like a steal and he'd do it with AK or AJ.