Quote:
Originally Posted by FijiOne
Its .01 ante so with a full 9 players a round costs a total of .12 (9 hands at .01 plus .01 sb and .02 bb).
To me this means effective stakes of .04/.08, is this correct?
Sorry if I've totally mangled terminology, thanks for any help.
Sounds sensible to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawk1ns
Which strategy sub-forum is the most active? I currently play HUSNGs but their forum seems all but dead. Maybe I am just not use to the amount of activity because I use to follow 2+2 in 2007 when poker was much more popular. It would be nice to take up a game that had a bit of a community around it where you could get/give advice and relate to people in the same situation as you.
Appreciate any replies!
I think the problem with HUSNG strategy is that a) a lot of it is solved (at least unexploitably), and b) a lot of it depends on the flow of the game so far. Not to mention c) that a lot of people want to keep what they've learnt to themselves as it's pretty lucrative. In 2007 we all had the "let's learn this fun game together!" mindset, but now we have the "I want to make money" mindset.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dididub
when using the rule of 4 and 2 to calculate odds of hitting, how can backdoor draws be included?
What's the rule of 4 and 2?