Hi there (
+excuses for my English),
Long story short : I want to start grinding my way outta poker. First step is (
imo) BankRoll Management. I thought about it a couple of time, and here are the results.
Wanted to know if, according to you, it’s OK or if I have to change some part of it. Any help / advices / etc. will be appreciated !
How it works :- BankRoll to start grinding : $250 (1), playing NL10 (2 tables first, up to 4) ;
- When hopefully BankRoll reach $750 (2), start playing NL25 (1 or 2 table first, with 1 or 2 NL10 table).
- In between, when BankRoll go up from $300 to $550 (3a): shoot allowed at NL25. But after a 4 Buy-In loss, move down to NL10 with BankRoll = $450 (3b) ;
- If BankRoll is down to ‘fourth column value’ (4), move down to previous limit.
Why those numbers : - Number of ‘Buy-In needed to play’ (Second column) at each limits increases while I move up ;
- When a majority (60% exactly, fifth column) of the “road to next limit” is done, I can shoot next Limit.
- Shooting the higher limit is limited to 4 Buy-Ins (sixth column). If I lose them, I move down, and continue grinding.
- With the increase of the ‘number of Buy-In needed to play’, the ratio (4 Buy-In loss of Limit+1)/BankRoll is decreasing. It means that the higher the limits, the smaller the “shoot up” is going to impact my BankRoll, if it fails.
- Shooting higher limits is allowed only when my BankRoll is increasing (I can’t try to shoot NL50 if I am moving down from NL100, but it’s OK if I was previously grinding NL25)
Feel free to correct my English : sorry, French-Noob here !
Many t’anks, comrades.