limit vs. no limit hold em
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 403
would it be correct to say that limit hold em is a more objective game than no limit hold em? in both forms of poker, there's no right way to play, and every decision is debatable, but limit hold em strikes me as a game that cuts down on that subjectivity. if u can put up with the swings it strikes me as a more "fundamentally based" game.
for all those hopeless dreamers that want to make a living playing poker some day, it seems to me that they do have to be grounded in limit hold em as a foundation for anything else
any input anyone?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,541
yeah, I think almost any poker player would agree with you on this, limit becomes more methodical while no limit is more of an art
