Quote:
ATM, you might want to consider the possibility that it's a good idea for you to leave some of these tables when your stack gets big. Deep-stacked no-limit (say 200 times the big blind or more) is a tougher, more complex game than medium-stacked (100 big blinds) or short-stacked (60 or less).
If you get up to £12, and other people also have this much and play better than you do, it's wise to leave and sit somewhere else with only £6 again.
Do you use any statistical software to keep track of your results? I once did an analysis of my own results which showed, to my great surprise, that my sweet spot for earning money was with around 80 big blinds effective stack. Yes, if you have 200 big blinds you ca win a 400 bb pot, but you can also lose it of course!
QFT
This is what I go by unless there's a player that I know is worse than me with a large stack. If everyone else still has a 100 BB stack, then it's not going to hurt you to stay, it's the same as still playing with $6.
I also don't like to leave as soon as I double up because I don't look at poker in terms of whether or not I won on a table. I look at poker as one big continuous game no matter what session/table I'm playing.
How much to play? As much as possible as long as it doesn't interfere with your other priorities. And this may sound like an oxymoron but I look for reasons to quit: if I'm tired, if I'm bored, if I'm hungry, if the game is no good for my style of play, etc. I take a break.