Quote:
Originally Posted by shetu
Considering what you said... Should I only use EV of folding to build my size strategy ? (If I exclude GTO line for the moment.)
It implied that I will add some value in the most overfold line I suppose.
I would mostly just look at the folding frequencies for the given sizing(s).
If we are primarily looking at river bets, because that is the easiest to interpret since there aren't future streets, then the EV a bet can approximated. When you bet there are roughly 4 things that can happen:
1. you bet and they fold and you win the amount in the middle
2. you bet and they call and you win
3. you bet and they call and you lose
4. you bet and they raise --> other lines vs. the raise
If you assume you are betting a ~0 equity hand, then your EV of betting is basically (1) + (3) where every time they call you lose.
EV = (% fold)*(pot in middle) - (1 - % fold)*(your bet)
Let % fold = F
Let (pot in middle) = P
Let (your bet) = B
Then:
EV = F% * (P) - (1 - F%)*B
Input whatever folding frequencies you have for given bet size, and just let P = 1 and B = a percentage of P for the bet size and find out which maximizes EV. I'd mostly be building my strategy around the situations where they are overfolding and under folding and just always bluff and never bluff for those spots and for the sizings that maximize the variable "EV".