Hello,

I'm going to train harder about calculating my equity . Do you think entering a x% VPIP on equilab is decently accurate of a x% VPIP you can meet at tables?

I don't quite get the question - all VPIP does is tell you what percentage of hands an opponent plays. Equilab I assume has a "default" range of what, say, 25% looks like, but you can't expect everyone's distribution to be exactly the same. Some may favour playing all pocket pairs at all reasonable times. Some might just play more broadway cards. Others may play more suited connectors and Axs hands. Some guy might actually be tighter, but he's loosened up trying to get in hands with a fish you haven't yet noticed to try to stack him.

In most cases it'll be fairly similar. Nobody's going to mess up the top 15% of hands, or the bottom 65%. It's whether, what and how from the 20% in the middle that'll change - but, as these hands are the closest to 0EV, the actual choices made aren't going to matter much

Oh ok thanks.

I created % ranges to train simply because during the times i was playing using gifted tickets , i really had a hard time to determine what compose the x % of VPIP of enemy , and i'm not really a caller so i don't have a lot of data on that (and worst of it , it seems i lost the data forever due to formatting pc ).

Maybe i should import internet ranges some people might use , i'll see (i have 0 other base to practice)

vpip is pretty easy to construct relatively accurately / figure out: What hands do people play? (The best/biggest/connected/paired hands) keep adding them from the top down until you get an appropriate %. i don't think you'd be off too far : )