Quote:
Originally Posted by crosswalkryan
Hi Raze,
What is your method of study?
Do you sit down at your computer and go over your HEM database and look at your hands by biggest losses, and look for mistakes? (or what do you find most effective?)
At what point do you find training videos less usefull?
What is your opinion of coaching for a player looking to make the jump from micro to small stakes? Or do you think similar results can be achieved by study, and that coaching is kind of the 'easy way out'?
Thanks for your time A+ thread
When I started settling into the NL600 level, I felt like my learning process needed to change in order for me to keep growing as a player. Prior to that, I had read basically every word written on 2+2, and I had bought and read about 3 dozen poker books, most of them several times from cover to cover. Then, I moved on to Cardrunners vids. I watched every HU NLHE, vid at a time when there was maybe 80 of them available, and all of CTS, Green Plastic, and sbrugby's vids. I still watch these training videos, and I think in general, they are the best investment available for your game. I don't think, at any point, that training videos will not be worth their weight. I recommend everyone to get a membership at one of the sites, and to study very closely. However, in the past year and a half, basically all of my study has been to give my opponents my full focus at the table, to get inside their heads as much as possible, and to always be mindful of ways to take exploitation to new levels, through creativity and experimental lines. In other words, I'm too lazy to review my sessions anymore :P
To tell the truth, I think going over your sessions is very, very important for less experienced players. I don't feel the need to do so regularly, because I am at a level where I am extremely confident in my play, and I have built my focus level to the point where I feel I don't often make considerable errors. Part confidence, part arrogance. And I'm not saying I'm at a point where I can't get better - I'm always watching trends in my opponent's lines and looking to exploit them in different ways. I used to always go over my biggest pots lost, but now I can easily separate the bad beats from the bad play. When I lose a big pot due to bad play, I will often go over it in the replayer, but if it was clearly a beat and I played it reasonably well, I won't sweat it.
I'm not sure what to tell you about coaching. I've never been coached, and I've never done paid coaching. I don't see how it can be bad, and it will probably pay for itself in the long run, and save you a lot of frustration. I have absorbed so much material from better players over the years, that you could say I've been coached, impersonally, all this time. I wouldn't call it a shortcut - I say it would probably improve your chances of reaching your goals, whatever they may be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John125
Raze, in past post you have given examples of villans stat ie(78/96/29) what do those stand for and what do you look for when you select a table?
"His stats come up as 26/21/2.6. "
26% VP$IP (percent of hands he plays, pre-flop)
21% PFR (percent of hands he raises, of all hands dealt, pre-flop)
2.6 aggression factor (for every 1 time he clicks 'Call' post-flop, he bets, raises, and folds 2.6 times)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BitchiBee
Any plans for HSNL Raze? Or PLO?
On my current site, there's rarely more than one 10/20nl game running, if at all. To step up, I would have to move to a bigger site, that has much tougher competition, and I'd probably have to take a step back to 3/6nl or even 2/4nl, adapt, accept a much lower winrate, and then press back up to 5/10nl and above. Right now, with other things going on in my life, this would take more time and trouble than I'd like to commit, so I have no immediate plans for big moves, other than to play more TAGs at 5/10nl HU, and to stab at good 10/20nl games more often.
I used to be interested in PLO a couple years ago, but then I became massively inspired to crush NLHE and get up the ladder, so PLO kind of faded out for me. I definitely won't rule out another shot at it down the line, but with NLHE going so well, I would be sacrificing a lot of money by taking playing time away from NLHE to learn PLO. Maybe after I drink all summer and neglect my poker game, I'll need a fresh kick in the ass to get going again, and I'll give PLO another shot.