Quote:
Originally Posted by stremba70
I think you missed the point. Nobody is saying he is better just because he plays higher stakes. They are saying he is better because his ROI at the higher stake is significantly higher than your ROI at the lower stakes. Lower stakes games are easier in general. If you had equal ROIs, the one achieved at higher stakes indicates better play. It’s far easier to achieve a given ROI at the lowest stakes than it is at 10x higher stakes. If he played at your stakes regularly, presumably his ROI would be even higher.
Also, the fact that you think beating this guy in this SNG proves anything shows that your understanding of poker is not too good. You could potentially beat a big name pro in any given SNG. That does not make you better. Results can only be compared over large sample sizes. Play 1000 SNGs with him and win 600+, then you can talk about beating him.
No; you're the one missing the point. If we're bringing up arbitrary statistics; winning is the end all be all of arbitrary statistics.
I'm not expecting to be better than a guy whose been playing on global since 2020. I've been playing since...two weeks ago.
I'm not asking about my stats compared to his; I get that he is better. Great.
What can be gleamed other than that re---arded f----ing statement.
Sorry, I'm not on top after two weeks of playing for money. My bad *******. I've built like 5 dollars in free cash into $20, i know, by your standards I should be playing HCL or I'm bad; but can we please talk his stats and how to better exploit him in the future?
What ****ing point is this site? To hear "You're bad" until you leave the site?
Edit: You know what; **** this website. I'm going to go build it up; then I'll come back when I have that experience apparently you all have. No matter what stakes are played; not good enough.
Fine, I'm not good enough. I'm going to go build bank roll from scratch and i can read about you bitches bitching about variance some more later.
Last edited by Lucy's Fur; 05-01-2024 at 12:58 PM.