April is my crack at 5/5 live so shall be fun. Also starting a personal challenge online, starting from 2NL Zoom want to see how high I can get by the end of the year achieving a min 95% confidence I am a winner at each level before moving up.
[ ] Continue to enjoy studying and playing with my new toy.
[ ] No more hero calls vs fish that you know have you beat, I mean no more, not even one more.
River: ($32.46) T (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $15.50, Hero calls $9.27 and is all-in
Spoiler:
Results: $51 pot ($2 rake)
Final Board: 2 J 2 4 T
Hero showed A K and won $49 ($24 net)
CO showed 6 7 and lost (-$25 net)
#hating poker today despite this
See just when I think I'm starting to get the hang of this poker thing a hand like this pops up that makes me think I know nothing.
How the heck do you put him on a worse hand than AK and make that river call?
I can see why you'd call flop against a minraise because of pot odds, and the turn too I guess. But the river I'd be folding for sure. I mean the only draw OTF (the FD) got there and tbh even if it didn't I'd fold ace high here...
Because raising the flop with any of those hands is terribad.
I know we're arguing on he same theme as the pay is bad, but the above statement (or at least the sentiment of it) is also untrue. We all know how bad villains are and will minraise the flop with a flopped boat, or an overpair, or the NFD as it happens all the time, which is why the call down is bad without reads imo.
So is 67s tbf. You're making some pretty huge assumptions to assume he doesn't have value there. You're also assuming his bluffs all lose to A high which they don't.
I know we're arguing on he same theme as the pay is bad, but the above statement (or at least the sentiment of it) is also untrue. We all know how bad villains are and will minraise the flop with a flopped boat, or an overpair, or the NFD as it happens all the time, which is why the call down is bad without reads imo.
Think we'll see FDs here more often than made hands. Bad regs tend to hear that they 'should' be bluffing with some hands but don't care whether they have made hands in their range.
Also people spazz on paired board. A lot. So while I think calling down here is a bit too thin given the spade, I think we can defend pretty wide in principle.
I don't disagree, and would expect us to call down with most of our value 3bet range, and any Asx obviously. I see this a lot with 88-QQ (not so often JJ) as villain has position and wants to a. semi-bluff to see if we have a hand that will continue, and b. pot control when called
Point b is bad as we'll be getting better odds to draw if we are, but villain does give himself the opportunity to play perfectly OTR by checking back any non-nutted hand
Point a when you think about it maybe isn't so bad if we'll call down with A high as per hero in this hand, but likely get more frisky with JJ+
You're a far better player than me so I'm not saying you're wrong but why is raising flop with a FD and QQ-JJ terribad?
We've got bluffs (FD) and value (overpairs and the FH) in our range so we should be balanced here yes?
Whenever I try and make a call like this anyway, 9/10 I get shown a jack at least.
TT and QQ can't raise for value because they're behind a c-range.
In theory raising JJ could be okay against some but it's a really narrow raising range and it allows villain to play a lot of his range really effectively when we call.
NFDs have SDV against our cbetting range and it's a waste to use them as bluffs, plus it's nice to have some hands which make nutty hands on flushing turns and rivers in our flatting range.
Non-nut FDs are too numerous to raise all of them (we'd want about 6 combos max if we're only raising JJ for value) and we have the problem that it can be tough for our flatting range if we raise JJ.