Well then u are completely wrong.

It comes with practice. Slowly add one more table every few days. I used to struggle with 4, now I will just die of absolute boredom if I play anything <8.

Would you like me to find the other post where you claim most of your experience comes from watching T.V.? You also gave us your SN on FTP, more proof that you rarely play.

this might sound silly but why not try MTing at the play money tables?

after a lot of practice 4 tabling is standard.. but 6+ gets hard for me

Now listen to me.


I have played cash games, HU, live, online the lot. I have a brain geared towards complete annalysation of a subject I want to learn about.

Sort of "excentric" if thats how you spell it.

Logic, theory and instinct is what I am designed for.

Stop trying to make me out to be some sort of poker wanna be.

Im just going to abandon 2+2 until I have my own roll and some graphs.

just moved back to 4 for 10nl... seems boring but its better to get used too it.. i prefer 6... good number for me

In before, what every happened to Mike Telford, wonder if he finally gave up.

lordy lordy mike.... prove it by playing and posting a graph... if you can't post a graph... quit trying to talk people into believing your just that good.. if you think your that good then keep it quietly to yourself and show us all how wrong we are when you can post a graph... (ALSO).. a graph with 150 hands on it doesn't say crap.. start posting us your graphs when you got to 10k and +.. and even 10k doesn't say a whole lot.. but would be greatly interested to tell you how wrong we all were when you can show us a graph until then.. trying to get everyone to believe that your the next philly helmuth is a bit of a joke also you can be a poker brat and not have your own air plane.. just cause you talk like philly doesn't make you philly... hehe oh philly my idol

Dude, you are playing 60% of hands. If you play HU this might be profitable (I don't play HU, take this from someone who has only played a tiny bit/watched some). If you play practically any other table size, you will get destroyed by everyone.

Playing <60% is so insanely standard that it's difficult to come up with a way to get it through how dumb it is. It is the equivalent of taking your money, putting it inside a car, dousing it in gasoline, and taking a flamethrower to it. You *might* (huge might) make a profit but it will not be anything resembling the profits anyone else shows, and the profit you can make even if you're playing way above your competition is still tiny.

There are many players who have more natural ability than just about everyone else. Your perception of your natural abilities to play poker does not make you nearly as good as you think you are, and doesn't even mean you have more natural ability than anyone else. Playing so loose in full ring, which if I recall is what that thread was about, is going to result in that car scenario I came up with above.

I think Mike if your VPIP is 70 you shouldn't multi-table, as you might stand a chance of having your roll last you more than a couple days, imo.

I will never give up.

Poker is my life. I breath it and sleep it.


It is one thing I can simply sit down and be good at. No tests. No exams. No rules.

My world. At the minute im a citizen on my own planet.

Soon I will be king.

If not soon. One day.