Quote:
Originally Posted by Hand2note
Hello,
Action Profit of a specific action in a specific hand equals the difference between our stack size at the end of the hand and our stack size right before the action. In other words, it equals amount of money our stack size receives until the end of the hand. If we fold then our stack size will be the same until the end of the hand and therefore Action Profit of fold is always zero.
Regarding Won it refers to winning all chips starting from the beginning of the hand.
It could be. A simple example of 2 hands:
Pot on the river is 100 (we put 50 in), opponent bets 50, we call 50 and win, Action profit +150, AmountWon +100.
Pot on the river is 100 (we put 50 in), opponent bets 60, we call 60 and lose, Action profit -60, AmountWon -110.
As a result Action profit +90, AmountWon -10.
You can find details of how Action Profit is calculated on the old site:
https://hand2note3.hand2note.com/Hel...-is-calculated
Hi, sorry to bother you again, I thought I understood perfectly as per my comment to your response before, however I still do not understand in regard to the example in the image I have attached to this post.
From what I understand following your examples, the main difference in the 'amount won' and the 'action profit' is that the action profit looks at the difference in stack size following a
certain decision in the hand whereas the amount won is the difference in stack size over the
entire hand.
From my (obviously flawed) understanding, if the decision in question is the first action that Hero makes in the hand (and he is not posting either of the Blinds), shouldn't the amount won be identical to the action profit? In the
image attached in THIS POST I am looking at a report for when Hero raises first in, in Early Position. Prior to Hero raising, he has not yet put any of his chips into the pot, and so from this point should the amount won not be equal to the action profit, by definition? Yet the amount won is negative while the action profit is negative. Again, I appreciate that it is me making a mistake somewhere.
Would it also be possible to clarify - in the
image in the INITIAL POST I made, I have used a custom filter involving various actions (Hero raises, Villain raises, Hero calls) - which decision is the 'action profit' based on? The first action of Hero raising in the first place, or the last action of Hero calling after Villain has then raised? I hope this makes sense.
Thank you for your patience,
Chris