Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread [PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread

08-15-2013 , 02:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12may2012
When will you take action against the ratholing 50bbs stack in Zoom ? It will be a huge improvement.
Yes please
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-15-2013 , 10:02 AM
Make Zoom deep with antes, 100BB buy-in minimum.

Nits and ratholers get the **** out.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-16-2013 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barthold
For the " hotkey settings" I would very much like the addition of 2 actions:

increment betsize
decrement betsize

then the addition to be able to set nr of BB's to increment or decrement
+1
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-16-2013 , 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant
it was planned that july 30th anti ratholing measures were implemented.

this didnt happen, when will they be implemented and what measures will be taken?
.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 08:18 AM
Could you please fix the issue where we lose focus from the active table when a new table pops up (yes i have the relevant box unchecked!)?
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 08:21 AM
I just changed one of my hotkey settings, after being done and trying to reg for a game i realized i was not loged in. Hotkey change worked and was saved nonetheless. Not sure if this is a bug or a feature, thought it was odd.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slugant
it was planned that july 30th anti ratholing measures were implemented.

this didnt happen, when will they be implemented and what measures will be taken?
this +1000
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 12:47 PM
I love the hotkeys but they are not selecting only the table under mouse. Even if you go to another monitor, actively click and write on a browser for example then often times the hotkeys continue to be unavailable. How do I notice that? Well, my c(call/ch), b(bet 70% pot) and f(fold to any bet) is disabled.

Kinda annoying but otherwise it works great!
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0nk3y
Make Zoom deep with antes, 100BB buy-in minimum.

Nits and ratholers get the **** out.
There used to be FT rush with antes, but it was never popular.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-17-2013 , 11:32 PM
Could we have the option of having different themes depending on the game type, please?
It'd be useful for when I open up 3 tables of NLHE and 3 tables of PLO, as I can quite quickly see which game is which table as I'm playing.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 03:46 AM
shorter rematch timebank for husng. tilts when all fishes do is hit and run and milk the time bank
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 04:52 AM
Any answer on increasing maximum Zoom entries on limit to 6 (or 8)? It's not 2010 anymore.

Kinda hard to believe in technical issues behind it, so what's the issue?
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 09:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iReap
Any answer on increasing maximum Zoom entries on limit to 6 (or 8)? It's not 2010 anymore.

Kinda hard to believe in technical issues behind it, so what's the issue?
The issue is that perhaps you cannot play 8 Zoom tables at once?
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iReap
Any answer on increasing maximum Zoom entries on limit to 6 (or 8)? It's not 2010 anymore.

Kinda hard to believe in technical issues behind it, so what's the issue?
Hard to believe stars don't want you to make them more rake? I'm pretty sure if it would work and wouldn't kill the games they would have done it by now.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zanardi
The issue is that perhaps you cannot play 8 Zoom tables at once?
Care to explain?

Currently playing 4x100 + 4x50 so i'm pretty sure 8x100 wouldn't be a problem.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yngwie Malmsteen
Hard to believe stars don't want you to make them more rake? I'm pretty sure if it would work and wouldn't kill the games they would have done it by now.
Hard to believe indeed...

Technical problem with increasing number of entries? You must be f joking.

Would it kill the games? I see no reason why, but maybe I just don't grasp it. People who join with 1 entry will keep doing it, doesn't matter if regs do 4 or 6 or 8 entries.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iReap
Care to explain?

Currently playing 4x100 + 4x50 so i'm pretty sure 8x100 wouldn't be a problem.
Can play 8x 100nl now if you want. 4 6max, and 4FR.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iReap
Hard to believe indeed...

Technical problem with increasing number of entries? You must be f joking.

Would it kill the games? I see no reason why, but maybe I just don't grasp it. People who join with 1 entry will keep doing it, doesn't matter if regs do 4 or 6 or 8 entries.
If you increased the number of entries you'd surely increase the hands played/hour and thus the rake generated. They must have a good reason not to do this, I would suspect that is either issues with seating multiple people at 8 different tables at once or them thinking the rakeback pros would all bleed dry as the average opponent gets tighter and longterm they would make less from zoom.

If you really can't theorise how increasing entries wouldn't at least damage the games then you're not very bright.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yngwie Malmsteen
If you increased the number of entries you'd surely increase the hands played/hour and thus the rake generated. They must have a good reason not to do this, I would suspect that is either issues with seating multiple people at 8 different tables at once or them thinking the rakeback pros would all bleed dry as the average opponent gets tighter and longterm they would make less from zoom.

If you really can't theorise how increasing entries wouldn't at least damage the games then you're not very bright.

It is either a very good reason that i fail to notice, or just negligence on Stars side. "We just copied the concept from FTP, they had 4 entries, so let's run it that way and forget about it"

Yes i can make theories, that doesn't make my theories right though (yours as well). I don't see regs making less money from more entries, f.e. FR micro stakes (NL100 is highest available) is and always will be rakeback over winrate.

Whether it is already 'reg infested' is hard to tell. Doubt it would be much more noticeable with 6 entries than it is nowadays.

I don't see sunday players moving away from Zoom because other people enter it 6 times. Still i don't know how these people think so i might be wrong.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyg2001
Can play 8x 100nl now if you want. 4 6max, and 4FR.
Ridiculous. SH and FR are very distant games with different skill caps. Playing both at the same time means only: you're extremely good (unlikely). or you're delusional (most likely) and playing weak game at half of your tables.

I'd rather play my stronger game at lower limit.

Which brings us back to asking for more entries at higher limit.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0nk3y
Make Zoom deep with antes, 100BB buy-in minimum.
Would love this.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-18-2013 , 10:15 PM
@iReap, the issue is that allowing regs more entries means that on average there are less fish/hand, as fish aren't the ones who multi-table to that extent. You instead get more multi-tabling nits who can't beat the game pre-RB but still can't be profited off in any real sense by other regs post-rake.
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-19-2013 , 02:54 AM
If anything they should decrease entries to 2 or 3... 8 entries and 6 regs at 90% of teh tables. Obv such a suggestion comes from some microstakes kid who has no clue about state of games at 200++.

If u want to play 8 mix fr/sh like anybody does those days anyways... different games, different skillset, are u ****ing kidding me? It's exactly same game wit less/moar seats and slightly different bvb ranges...
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-19-2013 , 02:31 PM
Hi!
If anyone from PS reads this- please add a table theme without these seating bubbles or whatever they are and that looks like this:
Spoiler:
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote
08-19-2013 , 03:57 PM
U mean like this ?
[PokerStars] Software Improvement Thread Quote

      
m