Quote:
Originally Posted by Yngwie Malmsteen
If you increased the number of entries you'd surely increase the hands played/hour and thus the rake generated. They must have a good reason not to do this, I would suspect that is either issues with seating multiple people at 8 different tables at once or them thinking the rakeback pros would all bleed dry as the average opponent gets tighter and longterm they would make less from zoom.
If you really can't theorise how increasing entries wouldn't at least damage the games then you're not very bright.
It is either a very good reason that i fail to notice, or just negligence on Stars side. "We just copied the concept from FTP, they had 4 entries, so let's run it that way and forget about it"
Yes i can make theories, that doesn't make my theories right though (yours as well). I don't see regs making less money from more entries, f.e. FR micro stakes (NL100 is highest available) is and always will be rakeback over winrate.
Whether it is already 'reg infested' is hard to tell. Doubt it would be much more noticeable with 6 entries than it is nowadays.
I don't see sunday players moving away from Zoom because other people enter it 6 times. Still i don't know how these people think so i might be wrong.