Quote:
Originally Posted by GobletTamer
First. Imagine you play HU vs fish (not that hard to imagine). Fish busts in the first hand (not that hard either). Should they be obliged to play another hand vs you?
I take your point but it's a pretty easy and obvious solution to let them quit if they bust. The idea is to prevent people exploiting the inequality in blinds by grimming. I don't think this is an issue vs recreational players. I mean maybe it's a storm in a teacup but I see others complain about this.
Quote:
Second. Sitout all solution brings another problems. There are lots of people who wouldn't play HU, but would start a 3-max game. If there's only two of them, how would they wait for third without an option to sitout on one table?
a) I don't see many tables that fill from 2 players sitting out. For all I know this is more common at highstakes.
b) Stars has their table starter system implemented, they could use that to allow players to start tables 3 handed if you join a pool
Quote:
The current solution is to take a sreenshot of someone sitouting after the fish goes afk (or camping in a running game) and send it to Stars Security team. The offender will be warned and might be banned for 24h in case they don't obey that rule after a warning.
I was not aware of this. But then this is why I'm asking the questions.
I'm not saying these suggestions are perfect, or even good, I'm wondering if they're closer to perfect than the current system. I'm sure Stars knows better than I do, and they may have already dismissed these ideas, but as a player I think these would improve my experience. Especially the sit out all or sit out none.
Last edited by Yngwie Malmsteen; 04-12-2013 at 03:59 PM.