Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybruin
Exothermic,
20-40BB CAP is an aberration that should have never existed in the first place on PS/FTP.
The normal way of describing a no limit table is 100BB of the big blind, for example, $0.10-$0.25 is called $25NL. People see and understand that. So in keeping with that example, offering people the option to play $25 CAP (100BB) at the table or regularly would be easily understood and a pop-up would tell them the CAP feature is only available if you top-up to 100BB if you fall below.
The player pool issue is really starting to hit home with people. Every time I hear some poker site saying they are going to create something new, I pray that it isn't something that splits the player pool. Stars already recently took the step to consolidate the PLO player pool. They need to get rid of 20BB CAP in no limit too but create this new idea I suggested. Their would riots if they created a 20-50BB CAP option at regular tables. You can't unleash 20-50 CAPpers at the regular tables, it needs to be 100BB.
Also, let me give you an example of something I've seen many times. A recreational player loses a buy-in then re-buys, loses another buy-in then re-buys and finally triples up to be exactly even. He is exactly even but leaves the table because he is sitting with an uncomfortable deep stack of 300BB. He leaves not because he wants to leave but because his stack is too deep. And the other players at the table are sad to see this loose break even/losing recreational player leave too. Just have an optional 100BB CAP option at regular tables with a mandatory top-up.
Get everyone back into the same player pool. Plus have an optional CAP feature for recreational players. It is a win-win for the health and future of no limit.
I agree with you about splitting the player pool. This is a big problem with STTs. For example, at the $1 level you can play 6-max or 9-max, turbo or regular, and 3 different formats (regular, knockout, Fifty/50). Now there is talk of adding hyperturbos at the lower levels.
Like everyone else, I have my favorite formats. I loved the DONs. And since I play a lot of large-field tournaments and don't get a lot of FPPs, and it might be nice to be able to throw in a few hyper STTs to bump up to the next VIP level once in a while.
But everyone can't have what they want if there is going to be a decent number of players in each pool. At the very least, put a moratorium on new games or formats or games for the rest of the year.
Last edited by Poker Clif; 03-18-2011 at 10:45 PM.
Reason: Changed "SNGs" to "STTs", spelling correction