Quote:
Originally Posted by TreadLightly
This is basically what they do already, if you lose a lot you will get better chest rewards + lower pt requirements. If you win a lot you will have very high point requirments and hit the higher tier rewards on your level of chest less often.
Stars also throws fun players and net depositors a lot of extra bonus challenges
I understand that - I just mean reward the winners when they are losing.
Last year I played zoom and made $800 working my way up from 10nl to 16nl and finally $25nl. I promptly lost $500 though both running badly and playing like a fool. And still the chest points required got larger and larger - so I stopped playing on stars for about 8 months. I also noticed that I had raked over $800 in this time.
After a few months of not playing, I was offered a single free reward of $10. I still didn’t play.
If my chest points had become more achievable as I started to lose against a tougher field, rather than increasing, I would have been playing on stars for the last 8 months.
I’m not suggesting that the overall winners receive as much rakeback as losing players. That model has clearly passed by. However, rather than add insult to injury as I bled money from my account, PS could have made my chest goals easier rather than harder.
I’m not saying I deserve easy money/easy chests - just that it would have kept me playing. I’m sure a lot of people feel the same when they encounter losses.