Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
Tom, those tests were voluntary things and not formally part of any medical procedure with no doctors involved.
Worst case scenario was you'd book an unnecessary doctor's appointment and they would do another test (which they'd do anyway as blood tests are regularly incorrect) and then proceed from there.
As seen by the "worst cases" highlighted in the lawsuit:
This is nothing like the picture you painted. You do this regularly. Please keep your needless exaggeration and hyperbole somewhere else.
First, please stop with the ad hom attacks about my "reputation". If you are going to make ad homs at least make them about something I care about. I can assure you that my reputation on 2p2 is less than an afterthought.
Second, you continually have missed the issue I have with your analogy. It's evidenced by the quoted material from USA today. Those claims help my argument. The issue is that comparing convenience tech, music tech, VR tech etc. to medical tech is not an apt analogy. Theranos's tech harmed people physically. Even if no one died, it's irrelevant to whether your analogy is bad or not. Other tech companies that fudged on what their tech could actually do did not put people at risk of physical harm.
Their fraud was far more serious than a standard tech start-up.