Quote:
Originally Posted by ASAP17
$200 off the June lows (+113%) & 2% from the ATH.
And massively underperforming the market still since the last batch of euphoria.
Quote:
Who knew that praying for an Enron, calling Elon a fraud and parking lot reports weren't a solid investment strategy?
Um, the last two
were a solid investment strategy. It's right here in the history of this thread. I recommended short at $300 on parking lot demand death/Elon's fraud and liked covering/long at $190 on the clear end of demand death, of which there were multiple pieces of data while the price was at lows. Fundamental data driven analysis has done very well on this stock.
Quote:
I'm sure this will mark a short term top
You're sure of that?
Quote:
but oh well, TSLAq is the gift that keeps on giving. Amazing community.
Why didn't you post this at $190? Why didn't you post at $190 that "Tesla bulls are the gift that keeps on giving" after it had dropped 50%? I'll tell you why - because you don't feel threatened intellectually by the bulls, whereas you do by the bears.
You can always tell the losers/losing traders/fish because they think a particular result in poker/price action in the market proves a particular analysis was right or wrong. There is no mention of fundamentals in your post (they've turned around strongly) and there is no mention of anything relevant. It's just pure silly snark from a silly poster. I honestly think you're just really insecure about intelligent people - TSLAQ are intelligent, but they have the same flaw as the bulls of seeing price action as confirming their thesis too much. I've argued with bears as a result to cover/get long at times.
Today was worth over 250% on calls on the amazing news this morning. Anyone who's always long or always short on this name isn't doing analysis well.