Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
huh, I was told on good authority that Tesla was unable to raise capital. Weird.
Three legs of the bear thesis from last year:
1. Early 2019 demand death/unprofitability. Can't sell enough cars at profitable levels and can't make cars for larger volume price points at anywhere near profitability. [This came true and tanked the stock to two year lows at $240].
2. Probably (>50%) can't raise. It makes no sense that Musk had failed to raise - he's either deliberately hurting his company by not raising (spending dived on capex and services/SG&A just as they ramped, leading to horrible service, unavailable parts, refund delays, and the brand ranking tanking 35 places in a year, also hurting demand) OR he's a total dickhead OR there's MNPI they want to keep hidden. [We have our answer - he's a total dickhead, although the story isn't played out yet and they may need to disclose more]
3. Tesla are highly incompetent with a toxic culture at anything other than making the bottom half of the car. Long term, Tesla needs $100 billion+ in new inflowing capital to survive, against fierce competition who can crush them in price:feature ratio at the lower end that Musk needs to grow. [We already saw a bit of the "long term" arrive as iPace helped destroy S/X sales in Europe, down over 50% even after huge price cuts and part of a $700 million loss]
Solid bear thesis, played out solidly. I see no reason why 1 and 3 won't continue. (2) was a highly rational probabilistic thesis but for the fact that it relied on Musk not being a dickhead (he clearly is).