Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Yet the insane clownboy Spurious thinks they're ahead with this utter trash that can't handle basic common conditions on highways like sunlight, vs fully autonomous taxi services in multiple cities deployed for over a year for GM + Waymo employees and early adopters...amazing stuff.
Musk has cucked his mind really well.
I am not sure why you think stupid marketing gigs like the autonomous driving event are catching my interest? The reason people buy Teslas is because they like the product. I'd be surprised if more than 5% of Tesla owners know where the TSLA stock price is and less than 2% know of bull**** like those events.
I have said time and time again that the reason I am bullish on TSLA is for relative reasons not for absolutes (e.g. 5k cars per week vs. 3k cars). Other car companies are hopelessly behind to TSLA when you look at the entire picture.
The path that TSLA goes down with autonomous driving is magnitudes more difficult than driving in a single city for which comprehensive data can be captured quite quickly.
Let's look at the the LIDAR vs. vision debate: what is commercially more viable to deploy to hundreds of thousands of cars? If TSLA solves the vision problem than the entire LIDAR deployment is a thing of the past. If they can't solve it, then LIDAR remains an extremely expensive method to deploy to cars commercially.
TSLA works on way more roads than Waymo and GM works and certainly has less accidents. You make it sound like the reason why the number of roughly 10'000 miles per accident is so extraordinary is due to the fact that 1) they are not at fault and 2) everything needs to be reported. But show me a driver that is involved in an accident every 10'000 miles and I show you an idiot.
In any case, the stock price is slowly but surely retracting. Something I have perfectly predicted for the past 2 years.