Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Writing a bunch of high school level chemistry babble doesn't cover your completely false and ignorant statement.
You don't rise to the level of making coherent observations, so there's little point in continuing. For comparison, Spurious does...
WTF does "scarce primary resources with increase in demand" mean? Power plants and lines aren't scarce. Right now, electricity demand grows every year far more than electric cars will impact it. By your stupid reasoning, the price of electricity must be soaring by now. In China, it must be $1,000,000 per kWh by your dopey reasoning; they've been building plants and transmission/delivery at breakneck speed, far faster than EVs ever will, quadrupling their energy production and delivery in 11 years. Demand bro! Sunk costs! Economics says the price must soar (just ignore the supply side and revenue/capex to fund it).
All "challenges" have been met. Nothing you say is sane. Sorry bro. Try to get to Spurious level of commentary at least.
The revenue shifting from gasoline to electricity and the forward capex to build that out is what funds it without increasing prices...like every other industry. The shift is sufficiently slow that there's no demand shock. just like the 1-6%/year electricity demand increase in every country without increasing prices. The notion that other electricity consumers will subsidize EVs is false. The notion that EVs won't be cheaper to build than ICE within 5 years is false. I don't know what's left to argue. I hate greenies and green power and all that wasteful bull****, but EVs are a clear area where the technology is superior on every level - cost, waste, energy efficiency, quality of product, etc, etc.
Increased power demand = increased use of scarce resource (NG/Coal) = Increased cost of scarce resource=increased cost of power = Increased cost of ev ownership
This is a certain fact. It's not debatable. Explain, empirically, how the cost of evs will go DOWN with increased adoption, when the thing that allows mass adoption (NG/Coal) goes up in price with increasing scarcity.
I mean literally the only way for your argument to be correct is if NG/Coal becomes unlimited