Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmann
This just sounds like some sick gambler at a roulette wheel.
You seem to assume far to easily you have some +ev system. Do you really think its that easy?
I never once claimed it was a +EV system. If you go back to the post and employ a little reading comprehension, you will see that it was an idea being spit-balled.
And the part you quoted is simply saying that if you decided not to daytrade, and took maybe a two or three day approach, a lot of the losers would’ve actually been winners. However, some of the one day winners would likely turn to losers as well, so a bit of a wash I suppose. Either way, I was essentially saying “your results may vary” depending on how you approach it.
But once again, at no point did I say this was the key to riches, or even a positive expectancy system. And before you say it... NO - inheritant in me posting it does not assume I believe it to be +EV. If anything, I wanted to get the ball rolling on an idea that was actually TA-related in the hopes that this doesn’t devolve into some Toothsayer/TurtleTom dick-swinging fest. Because God knows, we need more of that.
Just like in the few first pages of my “micro-stakes” thread - you have quite the annoying propensity to make baseless assumptions. At least TS in his dickishness manages to expound upon why he thinks someone is doing the wrong thing. How about actually being useful and giving a constructive response as to why the idea is -EV?
Last edited by CandyKreep; 12-17-2018 at 10:32 AM.