Quote:
Wow. Nice pick Jordan. Any thoughts on it at this price?
I think its still cheap and a fair price is in the 50's. I ddint sell any yesterday. I didnt sell for any of my clients either. Oly reason I would consider selling some now would be concentration issues, since my cost basis is $13, but even then I wouldnt want to right now.
Im still doing some work on the acquired company. It was an extremely good price, but the conference call gave us some useful information.
It was a competitive bidding process. That doesnt necessarily mean PRSC paid the highest amount, because this is Therese Reins baby and she is sticking around long term. She would want to agree on the vision for the company with the acquirer and also look to grow the company, things a PE shop couldnt offer. Still, it means no one bid much more than 4x ebitda, which is ridiculously low.
The majority of the business is in the UK. Its based on a new program run by their equivalent of the welfare office. The gov has outsourced the job of placing unemployed workers in appropriate jobs to private cos. The private cos get some up front but much more cash based on successfully placing people long term.
All the contracts run for 5 years and it started in 2011. My guess is bidders were afraid that in 2 years the government wouldnt renew the program or change the terms to make it less profitable. Hence a low multiple.
PRSC protected themselves by only paying 1.5x upfront. Even if the program dies after 2 years it would probably be a break even proposition for the. If it becomes the new model in the UK, PRSC is happy to pay out the full amount.
I started looking up how the population feels about the program, and how successful its been. Thats the best way to predict renewal or not, even if the current conservative government loses the next election. Im sure PRSC did the same work as me and is comfortable with the answers they got. And like I said before Shackelton did a really good job structuring the deal.