Quote:
Originally Posted by kimoser22
??? On what metric do you think AAPL is expensive?
I never took a position one way or the other about whether I thought AAPL was expensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mburke05
AngerPush is a complete moron who should not be posting anywhere near this forum. Yet for some reason he continues to post with some sort of faux-sense of knowing that comes from years of who knows what.
Anyway, in sum, he's an awful poster and I'd just ignore him like most ppl have.
I have zero idea why you think this. I'm learning, as most people itf are, but I know a great deal more than you think I do. I'm by no means close to a "complete moron". I think what I wrote was probably misinterpreted (or perhaps I misinterpreted what I was responding to)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jws43yale
I was asking this because the person claiming it was expensive seemed like they were clueless. I literally saw them going, wow this is $600 a share, so expensive. The fact that you find my question at issue and not the original comment shows how clueless you are.
I haven't been reading the thread, admittedly, in quite some time. I interpreted your question as if you were asking what people meant when they say a stock is expensive or not. That's what I thought you meant when you asked "Expensive relative to what". I must've taken your post out of context. I apologize if I came off rude.
I hear people say "wow, that stock is cheap because it's $40, or that one's expensive because it's $600, etc" and I just smh. I guess I thought you were misunderstanding what would make a stock relatively cheap or expensive.