Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Future The Future

09-02-2017 , 07:44 AM
The funnest thing about reading a thread straight through is you can rack up a sweet list of quotes for a multi. All emphasis mine.

ACT I

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
This thread really need to be on the Politics forum at the same time. Anybody know how to do that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
I think it's an interesting thread precisely because it's not in politics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbaseball
Very true! BFI is the last bastion of capitalism on this site. This thread and its socialistic tones have no business being here and it should be moved to politards where they salivate over this kind of crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
We know where the SJWs stand already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Lol, and if they lose the argument they will just try to get the thread deleted!

ACT II

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Before I go to bed, I just wanted to say something. I noticed you called for help in the politics forum because you seem to be under siege in this thread. The very nature of the politics forum means those posters can't survive here. That is why leftists need safe spaces, because in the real world their arguments don't hold up. There is a good reason why Jalfrezi showed up in this thread and immediately left - he has no one to protect him (MrWookie).

The real world is harsh. The pretend-world is growing up in a nice household where your thoughts are protected, and that is currently carried on through college where students demand to continue that farce. That is why when Millenials actually hit the "real world", aka the working world, they are incredibly disappointed and wind up in therapy. The real world isn't a safe space, and you'll get your ass kicked when smart, ruthless people own you. Leftists don't win in life.

Anyway, time for bed. I wish you well.

Edit : the reason this thread bothers you is because it isn't in the politics forum. Think about that. This thread wouldn't be possible there.

ACT III

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Samson tards up every thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Please leave.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
They are welcome to come make arguments here. Keep the SJWs where they are, though.

It doesn't matter in the end. Some SJW will claim offense, threaten the admins, and get things shut down or erased sooner or later. They are literally taking down statues, erasing American history, and firing people from Google for suggesting women and men can be interested in different things. Do you think them getting threads erased or forums closed on 2+2 is a big deal?

No one cares, neither do I. If they want to nuke someone they can nuke me first. Whatever.

SJWs ruin every single thing they touch. Name one thing in the world they have made better other than increasing the incomes for tattoo artists and for the people who make those earrings that stretch your earlobes out?
ACT IV

Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Do we really have to deal with these idiots?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbaseball
That is because the politards who never even knew this forum even existed have invaded and because of that the discussion is NO LONGER taking place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Mods - is there really a reason these people should be here?

Jalfrezi and 6ix should go.
Corvette should be lifetime banned, for his own safety. Dude sounds like he's going to hurt himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You are absolutely not doing that. You and the other politics posters are coming in here and tarding up the thread with personal attacks. You all swarmed in here to disrupt the discussion, which I thought was going along pretty marvelously until the usual suspects showed up.

You, trolly, corvette, 6ix, and samsonh all came here, into this particular forum and this particular thread to cause trouble. People like Howard Beale did not.

I personally don't want you here and I wish you'd leave.
If this were reverse, I would leave. I read the POG thread but I don't post in there because I know I'd be disruptive to their discussions. You seem to lack that self-awareness.

Please, leave.

FIN
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 07:51 AM
But srsly plz don't lock and/or delete this thread.

I realized I actually do want to hear the thoughts of a bunch of people that will name drop Hayek and Friedman like breathing air yet still consider UBI to be some fiendish commie plot.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 08:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
I realized I actually do want to hear the thoughts of a bunch of people that will name drop Hayek and Friedman like breathing air yet
You're the only one mentioning these people. Traders don't care so much for individuals, we know how easily people including luminaries are wrong. In fact, people being wrong is how we make our living. Market oriented people have much better grasp on complexities and the limits of human knowledge than ideologues, we deal with the real world daily and it costs us money if we're wrong (and a lot of money if we're very wrong).
Quote:
still consider UBI to be some fiendish commie plot.
Pretty much everyone here thinks UBI will be necessary and possibly desirable (it's been compared to stock ownership), we're just arguing about effects.

You're a loon running around tilting at windmills. Nothing you say is of interest.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 09:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
TS managed to toss in BLM here. That's incredible.
Did you miss the one about how those damn blacks ruined Zimbabwe bc they kicked out cultured and smart and hard working whites? And the were too dumb to and lazy to farm properly?
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Did you miss the one about how those damn blacks ruined Zimbabwe bc they kicked out cultured and smart and hard working whites? And the were too dumb to and lazy to farm properly?
What an accurate statement would read:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Did you miss the one about how those Zimbabwe natives ruined Zimbabwe's economy bc they kicked out experienced holders of capital, who knew how to apply it efficiently? And then were too incompetent to farm properly, thus showing how the forced distribution of capital away from experienced capital holders for social justice ends can have very bad unintended effects ?
Not as fun when you quote the example I was making accurately, is it?

The creepy racism overtones are all yours, friend. Own it. YOU see it in those terms because you're a racist creep in your heart...no one else here does.

I've quoted Mao's China as well, where they took capital of the "bourgeois" (meaning entrepreneur/capitalist) class and imprisoned them, and destroyed their economy and much of their civilization in the process. In fact there are lots of examples.

Hating the rich and wanting to steal from them has a horrible track record of ending well for the poor.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 10:30 AM
Victor is a failed poker player who spent the golden era of online poker building up small rolls and then donking them off in booze-fueled tilt sessions after being humiliated by his own ineptitude.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 10:35 AM
And whose gimmick account are you?
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
You're the only one mentioning these people. Traders don't care so much for individuals, we know how easily people including luminaries are wrong. In fact, people being wrong is how we make our living. Market oriented people have much better grasp on complexities and the limits of human knowledge than ideologues, we deal with the real world daily and it costs us money if we're wrong (and a lot of money if we're very wrong).

Pretty much everyone here thinks UBI will be necessary and possibly desirable
(it's been compared to stock ownership), we're just arguing about effects.

You're a loon running around tilting at windmills. Nothing you say is of interest.

Why would you type these lies?


p.s. The non-bolded part is too stupid for words but come on now, a part of you had to know that.

Last edited by 6ix; 09-02-2017 at 10:50 AM. Reason: lol
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 10:44 AM
Habit I guess.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 11:06 AM
Literally back to back posts. ****ing kiddie game bull****.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
...

Traders don't care so much for individuals...

...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
...

I've quoted Mao...

...
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 11:20 AM
Individual opinions
Mao's China.

I guess I'll just put you on ignore. Pointless noise.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Did you miss the one about how those damn blacks ruined Zimbabwe bc they kicked out cultured and smart and hard working whites? And the were too dumb to and lazy to farm properly?
This is a prime example of the mentality of people who only see things in the lens of race and bigotry. This is how you were taught to think, you can't view things for what they are or look at things logically, you can only see it in terms of victims and oppressor.

Your statement had nothing to do with what TS said. TS was giving an example of what happens when you take resources and responsibilities out of the hands of the people who are most efficient in deploying them. That creates a situation where you get sub-optimal results.

Let me take you through a thought exercise the other way : imagine an a racist NBA owner who refuses to employ anyone but whites? What do you think would happen to his NBA franchise? He only drafts and trades and hires white employees. Instead of him using the entire talent pool out there and taking the best players available, regardless of race, his own racism wins out and he only employs Whites.

I'll tell you what would happen - he would have a losing formula and his team would go straight down the tubes. He would be employing an inefficient strategy and every other team would have an innate advantage over him because they would not be restricted in hiring due to race.

That is exactly what Zimbabwe did due to their hatred of whites from their government. I don't care about who Zimbabwe or who they hate, (the same thing happens in Asia when the Chinese are kicked out, or in the Muslim world where Jews are kicked out), all I care about is the results of their policies and what we can learn from them.

Zimbabwe took the means of production away from a group of people due to their interpretation of "unfairness". They believed the whites were unfairly rich and productive due to their natural advantage of being in power historically. They did not like the result of what they were seeing, so they changed the rules. That, in turn, hurt THEMSELVES the most. Food production plummeted and caused massive problems for the country.

In yet another example - what do you think would happen if Google fired all their male engineers and hired only female engineers, due to their disdain for the patriarchy? Google would immediately decline, the same as Zimbabwe.

Wake up. Take the shroud of idiocy off you that was beaten into your head throughout your entire life. You believe in lies, which is making you stupid.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:15 PM
Analogizes playing basketball to running a government.

Challenges guy to an income battle freeroll, acts like a baby upon losing.

Writes lengthy screeds about how stupid everyone else is.

Winning.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:21 PM
<----- this is what winning looks like. Don't hate.

No one is up lifetime on me in the politics forum. Scoreboard.

Last edited by wil318466; 09-02-2017 at 12:30 PM.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:25 PM
I assume this is some kind of parody site? It's hard to tell these days.

Quote:
Levy’s Keynesian model incorporates a series of assumptions based on rigorous empirical studies of the micro and macro effects of unconditional cash transfers, taxation and government net spending and borrowing (see Marinescu (2017), Mason (2017), Coibion et al (2017), and Konczal and Steinbaum (2016)). Fundamentally, the larger the size of the UBI, the larger the increase in aggregate demand and thus the larger the resulting economy is. The individual macroeconomic indicators are (qualitatively) what one would predict given an increase in aggregate demand: in addition to the increase in output, employment, labor force participation, prices, and wages all go up as well. Even in a deficit-financed policy, an increase in the government’s liabilities is mitigated by the increase in aggregate demand.
This is high comedy. Nice find. This boils down to:

"Give the poor heaps of free money and the economy will grow through the roof. Is there a limit? Hell no. The more you give them, the more the economy grows"
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by commas,are,funny
Victor is a failed poker player who spent the golden era of online poker building up small rolls and then donking them off in booze-fueled tilt sessions after being humiliated by his own ineptitude.
lol dude its almost a lock that I made more than you at poker.

I wish I could fail at any other endeavor and make over a million dollars.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by commas,are,funny
Victor is a failed poker player who spent the golden era of online poker building up small rolls and then donking them off in booze-fueled tilt sessions after being humiliated by his own ineptitude.
didnt have a real job for over 10 years. traveled the world. stacked up a retirement fund. invested in learning a new skillset and now have a secure job and career.

pretty strange way to fail at something.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:47 PM
You played poker for 10 years and travelled the world and "stacked up a retirement fund", while making a million dollars?

Doesn't sound so impressive, honestly. Could have been fun though. What did you make every year and how much do you have in that retirement fund, and how old were you? What kind of living conditions were you in "while travelling the world"?

If you were 20, then it could be looked at as worthwhile. If you were >25, not so much.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by commas,are,funny
Victor is a failed poker player who spent the golden era of online poker building up small rolls and then donking them off in booze-fueled tilt sessions after being humiliated by his own ineptitude.
just to address the only part that may be accurate, I am almost positive that my booze filled donk fest numbers would not be considered a small roll to someone like you. likely more than you ever possessed.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:52 PM
Put the bottle down.

Over here.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 12:56 PM
RIP this thread, didnt realize sklansky invited politics posters in here.

pour one out for the robots.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
RIP this thread, didnt realize sklansky invited politics posters in here.

pour one out for the robots.
I was just thinking WTF happened to this thread. The conversation got so personal.

Now it just annoys me / is hard to follow and see the relevance.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
You played poker for 10 years and travelled the world and "stacked up a retirement fund", while making a million dollars?

Doesn't sound so impressive, honestly. Could have been fun though. What did you make every year and how much do you have in that retirement fund, and how old were you? What kind of living conditions were you in "while travelling the world"?

If you were 20, then it could be looked at as worthwhile. If you were >25, lol.

I am a single dude. think about it. I never worried about the price on something that I needed or wanted. ofc, I wasnt popping bottles of crystal and serving up coke parties or buying/renting million dollar houses or sick cars.

I put the max in my retirement every year (for tax reasons) which was like 22% or something. I didnt need the money to live on or buy stuff with so it was no problem.

and if you think averaging 100k at ages 25-35 is somehow lol, then I dunno, I guess I am actually a failure. seems good enough to me and now I work as a programmer and dont make near that as do most of my colleagues.

regardless, it wasnt meant to be a super brag of how amazing I am. just a refutation of failure.
The Future Quote
09-02-2017 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
RIP this thread, didnt realize sklansky invited politics posters in here.

pour one out for the robots.
ya sorry. Im not a big enough man to ignore blatant lies about myself.

mebbe talk to your comma boy about starting the whole thing.
The Future Quote

      
m