Quote:
Originally Posted by SootedPowa
This exchange just happened on twitter. I am curious about the statement from Adam Back that Dogecoin has "long known vulnerabilities."
Clearly one has to respect what he is saying from a computer science standpoint. However it doesn't seem to make any sense. If there truly were " long known vulnerabilities" wouldn't the Russians/Chinese/Whoever have long made off with the coins or crashed the market? Are the vulnerabilities being overstated/not particularly bad ones? Does anyone know what exactly is he talking about?
Why don't people kick over sandcastles? Same reason.
Bitcoin has had known vulnerabilities that have been fixed, and Dogecoin being behind development a copy of Bitcoin means it has those same flaws.