Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
John Nash created Bitcoin John Nash created Bitcoin

04-07-2014 , 03:35 AM
Quote:
Bitcoin is the first implementation of a concept called "crypto-currency", which was first described in 1998 by Wei Dai on the cypherpunks mailing list, suggesting the idea of a new form of money that uses cryptography to control its creation and transactions, rather than a central authority. The first Bitcoin specification and proof of concept was published in 2009 in a cryptography mailing list by Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi left the project in late 2010 without revealing much about himself. The community has since grown exponentially with many developers working on Bitcoin.

Satoshi's anonymity often raised unjustified concerns, many of which are linked to misunderstanding of the open-source nature of Bitcoin. The Bitcoin protocol and software are published openly and any developer around the world can review the code or make their own modified version of the Bitcoin software. Just like current developers, Satoshi's influence was limited to the changes he made being adopted by others and therefore he did not control Bitcoin. As such, the identity of Bitcoin's inventor is probably as relevant today as the identity of the person who invented paper.


https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

this is a 9 page paper that is the foundation of bitcoin.

this paper is the bargaining problem by Nash http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs286r/c...rs/nash50a.pdf

it has nine pages 9



What it describes is the difference between an economy without money vs one that has money. Bit coin is the 3rd level of that as it does what money does to the next level.

The paper/lecture below is by nash on something called ideal money, which is money that is interest free and not controled by a central bank. Bitcoin IS ideal money.

http://*********************/~babu/nash/money.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je22xKQekCk


We expect "satoshi nakamoto" is japenese.
When you take out "I am Nash" you are left with
"sato" and "koto"
Japenese is the key because if you didn't know the language then you could never match the words to verify the code cracking
sato = the most popular japenese nam
koto = japan's national instrument

The time lapse between the release of 'bitcoin' paper, and the time someone figures out it was nash IS the plan. It is a suspense and drama, in which all the governments create regulations against bitcoin. But when bitcoin is adopted by the people, these government regulations are just going to make it harder (therefore less desirable) for people to ever go back to the real system.

Bitcoin is a carefully selected 'piece' of the real plan, released in such away that no one could piece together what Nash was doing
04-07-2014 , 04:14 AM
So you think a mentally ill 85 year old is Satoshi? lol?
04-07-2014 , 04:22 AM
shhhh....

don't you get it? newguy1234 is Nash....

when you subtract 1 you get 2+3+4 = 9 .... 9 pages!!!!!! !!!! !!!!!!!!! O-M-G
04-07-2014 , 04:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by forchar
So you think a mentally ill 85 year old is Satoshi? lol?
3 years ago ideal money (2011)....bitcoin (2009) IS ideal money



#bitcoin #nash #Satoshi John Forbes Nash created bitcoin < ^ ^ > http://t.co/e1HoxVTGxR

Last edited by newguy1234; 04-07-2014 at 04:38 AM.
04-07-2014 , 04:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikers
shhhh....

don't you get it? newguy1234 is Nash....

when you subtract 1 you get 2+3+4 = 9 .... 9 pages!!!!!! !!!! !!!!!!!!! O-M-G
no no the 9 pages thing is just a coincidence by the same author, or at least I cannot show it to be more than that.

But if you understand the concept of a key (japanese) then you'll understand satoshi nakamoto is really a mathematical probability that is going to end up being 1 in x (where x is > population of the world) that its not John Nash.

The key is the proof.
04-07-2014 , 05:14 AM
probability is higher it is a spin on Nash work than Nash itself...
04-07-2014 , 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikers
probability is higher it is a spin on Nash work than Nash itself...
probability higher than 100% hasn't been accepted yet. read/ re read the papers i posted and pick up a non 0 amount of bitcoin
04-07-2014 , 05:30 AM
Quote:
In 2011, the National Security Agency declassified letters written by Nash in the 1950s, in which he had proposed a new encryption-decryption machine.[9] The letters show that Nash had anticipated many concepts of modern cryptography, which are based on computational hardness.[10]
tomorrow we wake to a different world the nobel prize was for only a fraction of what this man was/is/has going todo. now u know why they tried to brain wash him.

btw no one else is capable of what is going on

Last edited by newguy1234; 04-07-2014 at 05:36 AM.
04-07-2014 , 06:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1234
probability higher than 100% hasn't been accepted yet. read/ re read the papers i posted and pick up a non 0 amount of bitcoin
How many bitcoins would you like to bet on this?
04-07-2014 , 07:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by phantom_lord
How many bitcoins would you like to bet on this?
u r going to make a bet against john forbes nash? ur escrowing bitcoin and me cash?

Last edited by newguy1234; 04-07-2014 at 07:50 AM.
04-07-2014 , 08:09 AM
bitcoin = 2009
ideal money lecture = 2011
ideal money = 0 inflation
decentralized currency = 0 inflation
bitcoin =decentralized currency
bitcoin = ideal money
04-07-2014 , 08:40 AM
nope. Jed McCaleb is.

join the revolution: https://xrptalk.org/topic/1415-the-g...-xrp-giveaway/
04-07-2014 , 08:44 AM
strange 2 since its 5 years ago today

Last edited by newguy1234; 04-07-2014 at 08:51 AM. Reason: auspicious
04-07-2014 , 10:08 AM
is every one ok? the world is waiting on the poker players
Quote:
"In 1955, John Nash sent an amazing letter (PDF) to the NSA in order to support an encryption design that he suggested. In it, he anticipates computational complexity theory as well as modern cryptography. He also proposes that the security of encryption can be based on computational hardness and makes the distinction between polynomial time and exponential time: 'So a logical way to classify enciphering processes is by the way in which the computation length for the computation of the key increases with increasing length of the key. This is at best exponential and at worst probably at most a relatively small power of r, ar^2 or ar^3, as in substitution ciphers.'"
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m