Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
New York Times. One of the biggest, most influential, mainstream, lefty publications in the United States. Tests from December 2019 - January 2020 (that's as far back as the CDC blood sample testing went) found antibodies in the same proportion of the population as ~5 million Americans.
First of all, this is something that everyone's known for a while. And no, you can't just extrapolate that to the US as a whole to come up with 5million. They disproportionately tested blood samples from the regions that had early reported COVID cases. They also don't how many of those may be false positives (whether lab errors or other human coronaviruses). What they are saying isn't that the proportion here is reflective of the prevalence of COVID-19 in the US at the time, but rather statistically at least some of those are from actual COVID-19 infections, which means COVID-19 was in the US earlier than had been previously reported. Which, again, has already been widely discussed and accepted.
The study that has more recently been in the news:
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation...christmas-2019
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance...073?login=true
looks at All of Us Research Program Participants from January 2-March 18, 2020 and is nation-wide (though not necessarily evenly distributed). They found that 9 of 24,079 samples were positive. Again, nothing surprising there.
Whether the first US cases were from September, October, November or December and whether there was community transmission earlier than December - these are interesting questions, but none of this lends any credence to your insane theories.
Also, if hypothetically, COVID-19 was widespread in 2018 but no one really noticed, or whatever it is that you're trying to argue, that makes any particular conspiracy theory that ties its origin to WIV or US government or CCP or whatever (again, I have no idea which particular conspiratorial angle you're after here) a lot less likely.