Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Coronavirus Coronavirus

01-06-2021 , 12:55 AM
Odds of a 50% increase in cases in the next 3 months crashing the market?
01-06-2021 , 01:08 AM
I think we'll see some noise (profitable to trade short term) but I'm not sure we'll see a crash with a vaccine being rolled out and spring coming, not to mention stimulus checks and PPP going out which are direct market bids. I believe we'd need a meaningful shift in the expected future of corona - vaccine not working, more deadly strain - to see a March 2020 type selloff again.
01-06-2021 , 01:15 AM
So as far as I can see most US colleges are planning to reopen as usual for the spring semester (some will still be partially online or hybrid). Given the new more transmissible strain which will likely be dominant within 2 months or so, am I wrong in thinking this is lunacy? Colleges muddled through the Fall with a few bad outbreaks here and there, but the situation now is miles worse than it was in August.
01-06-2021 , 03:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wittgenheiny
Odds of a 50% increase in cases in the next 3 months crashing the market?
The market will crash like it did when the second wave hit in autumn.
01-06-2021 , 03:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
The last refuge of the lying scoundrel - claiming the (correct) math is wrong.

If it's not 1 in a million of 20-24 per week going on ventilators, what is the number? If you're going to claim the math is wrong let's hear what you think the math and data is, so I can demolish you on that as well.
this sums up most of the posts in the thread lol

a few guys giving their opinion with information and other people replying with

"lol you so wrong" "lol how stupid are you" "wow you're an idiot"

without even giving one reason
01-06-2021 , 04:14 AM
Is this thread supposed to be packed with investing and finance end bosses? Much like the poker section 95% are net losers
01-06-2021 , 04:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutella virus
Is this thread supposed to be packed with investing and finance end bosses? Much like the poker section 95% are net losers
finance end bosses don't use their own money kek that's for sure
01-06-2021 , 04:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Fun news from San Diego a few hours ago:




gg. If they're catching 32 broadly spread community transmitted (non-traveler) in a single county from samples collected a week-ago, with testing capacity for the new strain nowhere near online yet, there are at least 10s of thousands of cases of the new strain in the US spreading to many tens of thousands of right now. Soon to be hundreds of thousands. R is a lot lower in the US, but the extra 0.7 is enough to make this act not unlike the first wave.
The claim is that this strain is much more infectious and has been circulating for months. If so, it's inconcievable that it isn't well established in mainland Europe and the USA (among others) as well as the UK. Would be astonishing if it wasn't being found everywhere they look.
01-06-2021 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
I'll try again. For example the restaurant industry is shut down. Those people are losing their jobs, their businesses, their savings, their homes, mental health etc. This isn't the only industry. They are locking down the behavior of occupying and operating restaurants. What specific types of behavior is this making more safe? For example, are they sacrificing all that so you can go shopping store to store collecting dogshit masks and feel safer? What specific behavior are they sacrificing for? Remember, everyone has the choice to lock down on their own.

They are sitting at home watching their lives collapse so other people can _____

Right now it sounds like some people are asking others to sacrifice everything so they can feel safer at their jobs, shopping, etc with flimsy masks on. You specifically have posted about going store to store in a dogshit mask. How can you justify shutting down restaurants while you hit the mall for funsies?
Ok I'll have ago.

What we're 'demanding' is support for people lives and their income and their businesses. The government has been trying to do this with some some significant success between bouts of ignoring reality and persistant incompetence.

Youc an argue it's not worth it and the costs are too high but your current claim is simply false.
01-06-2021 , 06:14 AM
.....................



Covid is so out of control in CA that emergency workers have been instructed to ration oxygen to patients



and not only that


from the article:




"Health authorities in Los Angeles County have directed ambulance crews not to transport some cardiac arrest patients whose survival is unlikely. At some hospitals, patients are being lined up outside while workers try to find bed space."



"unlikely" -



I would interpret that to mean:




if the ambulance worker, a person with limited medical skills and knowledge, thinks a person has only a 25% chance of surviving - just let him go





https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/05/w...ronavirus.html

Last edited by FallawayJumper; 01-06-2021 at 06:31 AM.
01-06-2021 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Your second paragraph describes exactly the "let it rip" scenario that you attack in the first post. Burn-through is exactly the strategy you describe in your second paragraph: letting it go through the population at a level where the health care system doesn't overwhelm completely.

lol? This is like "nothingburger" where you don't even understand what's being said. Definitely the under on 140 LSAT.
Haha.

Nice assumption that you make there that 'let it rip' would NOT overburden the healthcare and would magically stop short. An assumption that is not tied to reality and is just magical thinking. It may be true but it may not.

And guess what if it is not? Then in your logic the lockdowns are needed.
01-06-2021 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Dear worthless loser,
I've been doing the math on this since January, and better than the experts. It's right here in this thread. You have never corrected or educated anyone in your life; you're the epitome of an absolutely worthless person.

You're confusing the position: excessive restrictions and burn-through avoidance selects more virulent strains with the position: lockdowns will be needed as a virulent strain gets out of hand so as not to overwhelm the health system.

You do this over and over, conflating things that any sane person sees are totally different. You're just a total loser/idiot who wastes everyone's time. Every post you do is like your "Nothingburger" posts where you waste everyone's time because you don't know what words mean, except that you can't follow arguments or points either. You're not even a person, just a madlibs generator.
hahahahaha oh what...

You first argue 'lockdowns are particular harmful when you have a more virulent strain competing with a lesser strain as the more virulent one will escape and propagate without competition... ergo worse'


Then later when a more virulent strain is proven to be the in the US and the math shows it will propagate at a very high rate compared to the prior strain you argue ' this will require lockdowns as this one is really bad'.


FLOL and only you can pretend both those positions are the same.

Yes I f*cking educated you and schooled you, you idiot. I laid it out in simple clear and detailed terms the fallacy you were assuming and you immediately moved to pivoting your position to align with mine.
01-06-2021 , 10:57 AM
For those who want to follow Tooth's pivot, caveat, backpedal in real time here it is below.



Tooth starts out with an absolute position that 'utilizing a lockdown when you have a more virulent strain competing with a lesser one is wrong'...

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Why are you dog whistling with the Denmark strain? It died out because of strict controls.

The U.K. strain which is the dangerous one has proliferated because it was allowed to spread and become the new dominant strain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Actually, you have it backwards. Lockdowns and restrictions help select the more prolific strains, the ones with high enough R that they can keep spreading despite lockdowns. ...
.
I then lay out for him in clear, easy to follow logic (as if I am talking to a child) why he is wrong...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
This is a profound misunderstanding of the science. No surprise.

There is no reason, zero, to believe the "more prolific strains" would not keep spreading at the same or greater rate in a 'let it rip' scenario. The 'let it rip' scenario DOES NOT see the "more prolific strain" out competed and its nonsense if you application of the science makes you think that.

What you are mistaking is predominantly seeing the "more prolific strain" in a lockdown absent the diminished 'weaker strains' for meaning the more "prolific strains" are doing better at spreading under those conditions and that is not the case.

For those who actually want to understand science and not just Tooth bro science, as misguided and ignorant as he is, here is what matters...

'Generations' for mutations are what matters the most. The more proliferation, the more generations, the more "prolific strains" that will hae time to emerge.
Tooth immediately begins his pivot, caveat, backpedal to say what he always meant was yes, locking down a more virulent strain is not only correct but might be REQUIRED now.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
And just to give an idea of what 0.7 extra R means, in 10 weeks starting from 10,000 cases:

Old strain = ~1.3^10 = 13x = 130,000 cases (the last week is 30K cases at once)
New strain = 2^10 = 1024x = 10,000,000 cases (the last week is 5 million cases at once)

One is manageable, the other is a disaster requiring shelter in place lockdowns.
Full mandatory and enforced lockdowns are now his position if he says that math holds and he says that is the same as what he said before.

FLOL
01-06-2021 , 11:04 AM
Quote:
Tooth starts out with an absolute position that 'utilizing a lockdown when you have a more virulent strain competing with a lesser one is wrong'...
Like I said, you'd score below 140 on an LSAT. For the 100th time across multiple people, something you characterize as being said is not what was said. Like thinking nothingburger means "nothing, zero".. You're so dumb you're not even a person, just a total loser that's nothing but a madlibs generator. Hoagie gets it said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoagie
Cuepee is super dumb.
01-06-2021 , 11:23 AM
Cuepee sorry but no one is reading these long, unintelligible rants.
01-06-2021 , 11:32 AM
Cuepee,


TS said lockdowns help select* the more prolific strain. (I'm not smart enough to know if this is true)

Then;

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
Old strain = ~1.3^10 = 13x = 130,000 cases (the last week is 30K cases at once)
New strain = 2^10 = 1024x = 10,000,000 cases (the last week is 5 million cases at once)

One is manageable, the other is a disaster requiring shelter in place lockdowns.
But you then rationalize that you schooled TS because of a situation where he thinks lockdowns are required and therefore you've been right all along.

It's as if you don't understand there is nuance to when a place might lockdown (see his points about very early in pandemic/Wuhan/without Covid being widespread).

You repeatedly read things people write and completely miscomprehend what they mean or their point.


Like the post that pointed out TS (the guy you've been calling a science denier) wears N95's while you collect free garbage masks. Then you wrote "lol" or something as if TS got "owned" when in fact it was you.
01-06-2021 , 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TooCuriousso1
Cuepee,


TS said lockdowns help select* the more prolific strain. (I'm not smart enough to know if this is true)

Then;



But you then rationalize that you schooled TS because of a situation where he thinks lockdowns are required and therefore you've been right all along.

It's as if you don't understand there is nuance to when a place might lockdown (see his points about very early in pandemic/Wuhan/without Covid being widespread).

You repeatedly read things people write and completely miscomprehend what they mean or their point.


Like the post that pointed out TS (the guy you've been calling a science denier) wears N95's while you collect free garbage masks. Then you wrote "lol" or something as if TS got "owned" when in fact it was you.
Haha, ya I am misunderstanding Tooth as this is not clear.

Quote:
ToothSayer
Actually, you have it backwards. Lockdowns and restrictions help select the more prolific strains, the ones with high enough R that they can keep spreading despite lockdowns. ...
Ergo LOCKDOWNS BAD. Makes spread of more virulent strain worse resulting in more deaths.

To

Quote:
ToothSayer
Old strain = ~1.3^10 = 13x = 130,000 cases (the last week is 30K cases at once)
New strain = 2^10 = 1024x = 10,000,000 cases (the last week is 5 million cases at once)

One is manageable, the other is a disaster requiring shelter in place lockdowns.
OMG this strain looks virulent and bad and thus NEEDS LOCKDOWN, LOCKDOWN GOOD, as the way to supress and restrain it.

FLOL at Tooth apologist brigade and their blatant stupidity. Yes idiot, by Tooths own logic a lockdown on THIS STRAIN would "help select* the more prolific strain." HELP IT. Make is even worse. Those are his words, until he backpedaled away from them.
01-06-2021 , 11:54 AM
Black<-->White

And nothing in between
01-06-2021 , 12:10 PM
I have a relative who is experiencing covid-like symptoms; she has not yet been diagnosed as having covid but has been tested and is waiting on test results which she should receive tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

In the meantime, besides doing all the things one does anytime you get sick--staying hydrated, getting plenty of rest, treating coughs & fevers with appropriate over-the-counter meds--is there any generally-accepted consensus on what vitamins, supplements, and other "possibly helpful but as-of-yet unproven" medicines one should take at the onset of symptoms with the goal of reducing the length and intensity of symptoms if one does in fact does have covid?

Sorry if this has previously been discussed in this thread, but I don't have time to wade through 100+ pages, and when I google this topic the advice is pretty generic, basically treat as one would do for flu and cold symptoms, and go to the hospital if you're having trouble breathing.
01-06-2021 , 12:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pride of Cucamonga
I have a relative who is experiencing covid-like symptoms; she has not yet been diagnosed as having covid but has been tested and is waiting on test results which she should receive tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

In the meantime, besides doing all the things one does anytime you get sick--staying hydrated, getting plenty of rest, treating coughs & fevers with appropriate over-the-counter meds--is there any generally-accepted consensus on what vitamins, supplements, and other "possibly helpful but as-of-yet unproven" medicines one should take at the onset of symptoms with the goal of reducing the length and intensity of symptoms if one does in fact does have covid?

Sorry if this has previously been discussed in this thread, but I don't have time to wade through 100+ pages, and when I google this topic the advice is pretty generic, basically treat as one would do for flu and cold symptoms, and go to the hospital if you're having trouble breathing.
I'm not a doctor or scientist or anything but it does seem like the evidence is significant that being deficient in vitamin D is bad for covid patient outcomes.
01-06-2021 , 12:20 PM
Cuepee,
You are misunderstanding because you're a worthless idiot with the reading comprehension levels of a special needs child. I have never met anyone on 2p2 as stupid as you.

Position 1: Lockdowns and restrictions help select a more prolific strain because they prevent immunity developing optimally. When prolific = 100 cases and non-prolific = 2,000,000 cases, restrictions give the prolific version time to grow and overtake the non-prolific compared to a burn through scenario. Then when it has overtaken, the R of the prolific strain is a lot higher than it would be in a burn through scenario as well (due to lower immunity).

Position 2: Once the prolific strain reaches broad spread and has succeeded in outcompeting the non-prolific strain, lockdowns are necessary to stop overwhelming of health services.

These aren't in the slightest bit incompatible. You're just a completely worthless loser wasting everyone's time again because you have a toxic combination of unbelievable stupidity, terrible reading comprehension (the worst I've ever seen), and aggressive gotcha attempts. It's so epically stupid that it's just madlibs.

Any forum that isn't broken bans worthless losers like you. We really need some active moderators who actually read these threads. All of current ones are busy with life.
01-06-2021 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pride of Cucamonga
I have a relative who is experiencing covid-like symptoms; she has not yet been diagnosed as having covid but has been tested and is waiting on test results which she should receive tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

In the meantime, besides doing all the things one does anytime you get sick--staying hydrated, getting plenty of rest, treating coughs & fevers with appropriate over-the-counter meds
I would recommend against the latter. Let your immune system do its thing rather than mess with it. Early on there was fairly good evidence that over-the-counter meds for symptoms made covid progress to worse outcomes. I don't know where the evidence is on this at this point however.

Quote:
--is there any generally-accepted consensus on what vitamins, supplements, and other "possibly helpful but as-of-yet unproven" medicines one should take at the onset of symptoms with the goal of reducing the length and intensity of symptoms if one does in fact does have covid?
There's nothing you can do. Rest, fluids, simple healthy foods are it.
01-06-2021 , 12:46 PM
The NYTimes writing about T cell immunity.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/h...-immunity.html

Also, since it's winter, excess deaths in Europe should be going through the stratosphere right now. So let's check in with euromomo.

https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/

Deaths over the last four weeks have been under the 2018 flu season. But obviously we have to wait until winter really starts, as December is just the beginning of winter.
01-06-2021 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pride of Cucamonga
I have a relative who is experiencing covid-like symptoms; she has not yet been diagnosed as having covid but has been tested and is waiting on test results which she should receive tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

In the meantime, besides doing all the things one does anytime you get sick--staying hydrated, getting plenty of rest, treating coughs & fevers with appropriate over-the-counter meds--is there any generally-accepted consensus on what vitamins, supplements, and other "possibly helpful but as-of-yet unproven" medicines one should take at the onset of symptoms with the goal of reducing the length and intensity of symptoms if one does in fact does have covid?

Sorry if this has previously been discussed in this thread, but I don't have time to wade through 100+ pages, and when I google this topic the advice is pretty generic, basically treat as one would do for flu and cold symptoms, and go to the hospital if you're having trouble breathing.
Disclaimer: I am not a doctor and this is not medical advice. I am dumb (but not as dumb as Cuepee), call a doctor for their recommendations.

A few months ago the ER doc I'm friends with strongly recommended taking aspirin early/during (assuming I/one had no reason to believe they couldn't take aspirin). Which seems to be pretty well supported these days from what I can tell. Due to it's anticoagulant properties and the way Covid causes issues on that front.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574725/
Quote:
5. Conclusion
A comprehensive and highly plausible model has been proposed in this paper detailing the pathophysiological steps of COVID-19 from the point of initial infection of type II alveolar epithelial cells by SARS-CoV-2 to the ultimate development of ARDS. This model highlights are various several potential control points where targeted therapeutic interventions might produce significant benefits in reducing the severity of disease. Several lines of evidence suggest a role for dexamethasone for the treatment of ARDS. In addition, consideration of data supplied by human an animal studies also highlight the potential efficacy of Zn supplementation, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin, oral or intravenous administration of NAC, IV Vit C and oral Vit D. Moreover, when used at appropriate doses, these supplements and drugs generally have an exceptionally good safety record. Hence, based on this evidence, it is recommended that randomised trials of these therapeutic substances in COVID-19 are in order. Given that excessive levels systemic inflammation seen in patients with severe COVID-19 is likely to lead to depleted levels of Vit C, Vit D and Zn in many individuals and significant differences in their mode of action as anti-inflammatory agents, it is suggested that they should be used in combination. Equally, the use of aspirin at a dose in excess of 300 mg, NAC and AZM offers the prospect of localised NF-κB inhibition and reducing the activation of the coagulation cascade characteristic of severe COVID-19.
01-06-2021 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pride of Cucamonga
I have a relative who is experiencing covid-like symptoms; she has not yet been diagnosed as having covid but has been tested and is waiting on test results which she should receive tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

In the meantime, besides doing all the things one does anytime you get sick--staying hydrated, getting plenty of rest, treating coughs & fevers with appropriate over-the-counter meds--is there any generally-accepted consensus on what vitamins, supplements, and other "possibly helpful but as-of-yet unproven" medicines one should take at the onset of symptoms with the goal of reducing the length and intensity of symptoms if one does in fact does have covid?

Sorry if this has previously been discussed in this thread, but I don't have time to wade through 100+ pages, and when I google this topic the advice is pretty generic, basically treat as one would do for flu and cold symptoms, and go to the hospital if you're having trouble breathing.
I've gotten the symptoms on 31st and tested positive last saturday. I didn't take any pain relief, I did however took a lot of Vit D, C and Zink the first 5 days and mainly drank tea. Today I feel I am completely fine, still need to get back the scent of smell though (lost in 2 days ago). I believe this is a normal timeframe for getting over covid so I don't think vitamins did anything.

Getting enough sleep and resting is the most important imho - I didnt have fever but was very very tired the first 4 days. I'm in early 30s, active and of good health otherwise (don't remember when I was ill the last time)

      
m