The NHS has been fantastic. There's unanimity on this in the UK afaics.

Whether that will be enough in the on-coming economic and political turmoil remains to be seen.

It is pretty chef's kiss to see TS, who has constantly railed against trusting experts and against Fauci in particular, cite Fauci.

This is a feature not a bug. Red states are really trying to twist, distort or simply hide data to justify WE'RE OPEN FOR BUSINESS. I'm surprised the CDC is going to muddle the data too, but it's hard to believe it's an accident in the current context.

If you didn't see Georgia's attempt to distort data by putting it out of chronological order to make it appear to slope downward, look it up. There's just no way it happened unintentionally.

That's what I was thinking!

Although I had never heard of Chef's Kiss before, googled and lol'd. I'll use that now, ty

Using experts to refute people who love them and claim to be experts themselves is the real chef's kiss.

"90% by November is insane! You're such an idiot! I asked two experts and they think you're way off!" => I quote one of the world's leading virus experts saying 80% chance of success by September for just a single vaccine.

"I'm an expert, the Moderna data is a joke, you have no clue what you're talking about calling it important. You are so out of your depth" => I quote Fauci today calling it a big deal in exactly the same way I did

Total ownage.

There's no "too". The CDC (and deep state experts) first gave up this pandemic with their tragicomic incompetence by screwing up simple tests that even small countries and private labs with 1/100th of the US budget got right. Now they give us bogus data that a smart 3 year old could keep apart. Trying to link it to red states is cute and shows complete partisan irrationality. And no, this is straight up incompetence, nothing to do with red states:
A few weeks to separate a bit of data - that's about the same time it took them to find out their flawed tests were flawed, an absolute joke that has cost 90,000 lives and counting. This is the highly competent deep state in action.

Front line NHS has been fantastic, I agree. However, that does not preclude the possibility mistakes have been made in the management of patients, particularly those dispatched to care homes.

You said MODERNA is 90% of the way to producing a vaccine. I said no, MODERNA is not 90% that is way off. You clearly agree with me now too.

I had a close older relative pass away a few days ago (not Covid) but they did spend 10 days in a hospital with lots of Covid patients, granted in a different wing but entrances for all of the public are the same. No regrets but it was not lost on me those multiple, several hours each visits were my highest direct exposure potential since all this started in early March in the US and I began working from home.

Of course my wife does CV tests on people multiple times per week but she is in full PPE. At the hospital most people had on awful homemade masks barely covering their mouth and noses not at all. Saw one guy with a crochet mask, just wow. That's isn't stopping a golf ball much less micron particles

My local hospital will not allow any visitors. This week I had to take my mother (93) to a doctors appointment at the hospital and could only drop her off and pick her up at the door. She herself had to be temperature checked at the door before entering. So at least here they are taking no chances letting anyone in who absolutely doesn't need to be there.

Study finds use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with or without a macrolide is linked to increased rates of mortality and heart arrhythmias among hospital patients with COVID19:
https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status...09107175358465



Full study (haven't read yet):
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...180-6/fulltext

Birx commentary on it:

Too good to miss: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...fter-thursday/

Fair point, Can't say I'm a huge fan of some of the management but in this case I'm not sure it wasn't primarily a government responsibility.

But no doubt some did a worse job. I did see that patients catching covid in hospital was particularity bad in one (unmentioned) trust. So yes some questions to answer.

Moderna's cfo pump n dump.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/inves...les/index.html

Yeah this was always going to happen.

These were automated transactions that were set in place prior to the results being known. Timing just seems like a coincidence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/healt...6df_story.html

Sale was scheduled, news wasn't

https://news.yahoo.com/new-yahoo-new...152843610.html

So how are those proclaiming >1% IFR reconciling the CDC "best estimate" of 0.4% in US? LOL CDC, Trump involvement, bad assumptions, bad data? I saw some of the data was limited to 3/1 - 3/31.

I love Yahoo.
The Dems are so much smarter obviously.
Ok, maybe not.

And, where did these rumors start?
And of course no one would ever track smartphones.

Great read. Connects the dots on Covid-19 in a way that you would never see from an MSM source. It also explains why the elderly have orders of magnitude higher IFR.

If one could prove this is the only known virus to behave this way then it's basically a slam dunk. Even with the evidence presented it casts a strong circumstantial case, along with other circumstantial evidence presented. Of course China would never knowingly release data to prove their intentions.

It definitely came out of a lab. The only questions are which one, and was it accidental?

Cite?

"US Deaths Near 100,000, An Incalculable Loss"
- NY Times

Elderly have orders of magnitude higher death rates from getting punched in the face. Connect the dots.