Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Coronavirus Coronavirus

03-18-2020 , 12:32 PM
ToothSayer is live on the phone on CNBC right now freaking out about Coronavirus.
03-18-2020 , 12:34 PM
And what is the plan if the virus mutates or we cant find a cure? Stop society indefinitely? You probably have more people die of poverty from massive economic depression than the virus would have killed.
03-18-2020 , 12:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
ToothSayer is live on the phone on CNBC right now freaking out about Coronavirus.
Can never tell if you're serious, if serious is there a clip?
03-18-2020 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
That will be the Chinese government no doubt. They've been waging large scale cyber warfare for years infiltrating US systems to steal trade secrets and probe vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure.

Firstly, regular flu mortality rates are 0.05% to 0.1%. But that's skewed entirely to the old.

Regular flu has a 0.0018% mortality rate for under 40s
This has a 0.2% mortality rate for under 40s (with medical care). If this goes through most of the population as the Brits are predicting/trying to make happen then 100x more young people will die from it than the flu. About 2K a year die from the flu in under 40s and many of those are no doubt already sick. 200K young people will die from this if it goes through the population, and 1-2 million will end up in hospital.

Coronavirus is still dangerous to the young. 1 in 500 will die. I'm guessing around 1-3% end up in hospital with severe lung damage (this is the data I don't have). The hospitals in France and Belgium are filling up with 30-50% young people under 60 with severe pneumonia.


We know of numerous young people who died - healthy doctors in their 20s and 30s as well regular people. The patient zero in Italy was a healthy 38 year old who spent two weeks in intensive care on a respirator.

So no, this isn't "just the flu" for young people. Most of the time you'll be fine, but there's a not-small chance you'll be knocked on your ass by it, get lung damage, need oxygen or in 1-3% of cases, a ventilator. Good luck getting one of those when the hospitals get full.
if the alternative is everyone does nothing and lives in isolation for a year, ill take my chances

Last edited by spino1i; 03-18-2020 at 12:46 PM.
03-18-2020 , 12:48 PM
instead of mass social distancing, the old and the immunosuppressed need to isolate themselves until a vaccine is found and the rest of us need to take our chances with the virus. So that society can keep running.
03-18-2020 , 12:52 PM
In 4.8 million Ireland on the 17th:

Quote:
Retail group fears 200,000 jobs could be lost this week

this would be in addition to 140,000 who had already lost jobs.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...week-1.4204963
03-18-2020 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
If people aren't complete ******s they will bypass some safety procedures and pick some of the best candidates for injection. The vaccines don't need to be completely safe. Just safer than the virus.
I agree with this. vaccine should skip normal approval process and be greatly sped up.
03-18-2020 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
if the alternative is everyone does nothing and lives in isolation for a year, ill take my chances
If you lock down hard you can go back to normal life in 4-6 weeks, sooner in less infected areas, with no death.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
instead of mass social distancing, the old and the immunosuppressed need to isolate themselves until a vaccine is found and the rest of us need to take our chances with the virus. So that society can keep running.
Won't work. Death rates are too high. Hospitalization-required rates are WAY too high, they quickly overwhelm and the death rate soars. These are the numbers assuming a 0.9% case fatality rate, from despacito's link above:



You can multiple those death rates by 5 without hospital treatment (once hospitals overflow, which happens at a tiny percentage infected).

This isn't just the old. Look at the hospitalization-required rate for 30 and 40 year olds. That overwhelms in no time.
03-18-2020 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
Can never tell if you're serious, if serious is there a clip?
Cliffs: I'm an optimist but 1 million Americans could die. Most big businesses can't survive a quarter with no revenue. The US treasury doesn't have enough money to bail everyone out. I'm a major Hilton shareholder but Hilton is going to zero. I'm buying more Hilton today as it goes down in the hope that we'll have a 30 day shutdown. President needs to go on TV and order a nationwide 30 day shutdown. President should use national guard to enforce shutdown if necessary.

This was better than his fight with Carl Icahn, IMO. Will post clip tonight if I see it posted.

Spoiler:
It is possible that Bill Ackman is not actually ToothSayer
03-18-2020 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
If you lock down hard you can go back to normal life in 4-6 weeks, sooner in less infected areas, with no death.
.
This will not work. The virus will come right back. That imperial college paper even said so.
03-18-2020 , 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
instead of mass social distancing, the old and the immunosuppressed need to isolate themselves until a vaccine is found and the rest of us need to take our chances with the virus. So that society can keep running.
immunosuppressed?

US population

40% obese
10% diabetes, 20% pre-diabetes
9% asthma

There for sure is some (significant) overlap but you would end up isolating at least 1/3 of the under 60 population for 12+ months.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
I agree with this. vaccine should skip normal approval process and be greatly sped up.
You do that and could end up injecting healthy people with something as bad or worse than the virus.
03-18-2020 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
If you lock down hard you can go back to normal life in 4-6 weeks, sooner in less infected areas, with no death.

Won't work. Death rates are too high. Hospitalization-required rates are WAY too high, they quickly overwhelm and the death rate soars. These are the numbers assuming a 0.9% case fatality rate, from despacito's link above:



You can multiple those death rates by 5 without hospital treatment (once hospitals overflow, which happens at a tiny percentage infected).

This isn't just the old. Look at the hospitalization-required rate for 30 and 40 year olds. That overwhelms in no time.
.4% among those under 40 is bad but its not worth shutting down society over
03-18-2020 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chytry


You do that and could end up injecting healthy people with something as bad or worse than the virus.
Nothing is without risks in life
diabetes!= immunosuppressed
03-18-2020 , 01:06 PM
Former base/precious metals trader. 15 year lurker of mid-high lhe and more recently BFI. Wish I had found it a long time ago, you guys are great.

Barring any mutations, once a person has been infected, has recovered and is no longer shedding the virus, are they safe to go about their normal business/go back to work? Any risks in that to themselves or others?
03-18-2020 , 01:09 PM
A friend of mine in the medical field made a good point today regarding the possible overestimation of the severity of this coronavirus. Since the sample of people we have tested/positive/dead only includes those who show symptoms or in some cases who were exposed to someone who showed symptoms, the sample proportion will be skewed towards the more severe cases, skewing population death rate estimations. Since the younger you are, the less likely you are to be affected, the 0.2% death rate for under 40s is probably high. How high is anyones guess. It's also possible that they take this into account when calculating? Maybe someone better versed in statistics can respond?

Last edited by Wittgenheiny; 03-18-2020 at 01:18 PM.
03-18-2020 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
If people aren't complete ******s they will bypass some safety procedures and pick some of the best candidates for injection. The vaccines don't need to be completely safe. Just safer than the virus.

I have been banging this drum for days.
03-18-2020 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
Can never tell if you're serious, if serious is there a clip?

You've been leveled, rick.
03-18-2020 , 01:25 PM
The governer of Lombardy, the most heavily hit region of Italy, said today that the healthcare system is about to collapse. Death figures & critical cases continue to increase.

Lombardy has been under strict lockdown since March 8, and it's still collapsing 10 days later.

Anyone saying ITT that lockdown is probably not efficient or not necessary, is an idiot. And you will be proven to be an idiot soon enough.
03-18-2020 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spino1i
.4% among those under 40 is bad but its not worth shutting down society over
That's 120,000 dead if 25% infected.

Add to that people with various short and long-term consequences.

Add to that people dying from all other reasons. Some would overlap but can you imagine what the healthcare system would look like?

Last edited by chytry; 03-18-2020 at 01:37 PM.
03-18-2020 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
My friend is a teacher at a daycare and the number of kids went 40 kids down to 3 kids. They sent her home for the time being and she doesn't know if she will have a job.

Another friend of mine works at a hotel and hotel staff were just laid off en masse, she's down to 2 days, there's no more foreigners! No more bookings.

Another friend of mine is a personal trainer and gyms are closed everywhere.

A contractor I work with my development projects just had her retail projects pulled midway through construction. She has to put a lot of her workers on EI.

This is 7 days in.
This is why I think it’s correct to be short the market. This is just going to get worse due to big city numbers increasing daily and people panicking. Feel bad for people that lose their jobs for this bc it’s really not something that could have even remotely been predicted.

Btw govt might give 1k to everyone. Hmm idk how much that is going to help. When I lived on my own, my rent was 1k a month in a medium- to small city in the downtown area which is a higher price than suburbs etc. I don’t think 1k is going far to people that may have lost serving, hotel, travel industry positions. I’m currently short the market and feel bad that I’m kinda rooting for this to get worse to recoup some of the insane money I had earmarked for a home purchase etc but will prolly look to get out of stocks shortly (401k will stay in but personal acct will go 100% cash). I think nyc is going to be on full lockdown within 24-72 hrs which will really lol crush the market. Only thing I can say positive is that once this is over, a lot of value can be had in the market.

Square (SQ) was killing prior to this hiccup at 80/share. Currently at 35 a share. I wouldn’t touch the stock now with a 10 foot pole however when this clears, I think this could be a huge bagger if time horizon is 5-10 years. Easily think this company could produce a 200-500 dollar share price down the road. Now, they deal heavily with small business so I’ll wait for he stock to really get hammered and find a better entry point.
03-18-2020 , 01:48 PM
03-18-2020 , 01:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
Warehouse I'm delivering to ran out of storage space for chicken and eggs. Lot of drivers waiting for space to open up. One driver has been here since Monday. Guards at check-in are frazzled. Took my potatoes and I'm antsy to get out of the city.
Mind mentioning what region this is? Thx
03-18-2020 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
If you grew up in the Soviet Union, like "yeah but where's the 5 feet of snow?"
03-18-2020 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
This can’t be real life.
03-18-2020 , 01:55 PM
UK death curve putting in work.

      
m