Quote:
Originally Posted by heltok
Citation/reasoning needed!
Ethereum has handled at least 27tps already, but no hard limit was hit and I personally think it could handle 100tps+.
Sidechains and LN sounds fine, but who knows, they might have more issues than TheDAO, which btw is being white-hat attacked right now. 70% of all TheDAO funds should be safely secured soon so that should limit the potential loss from the hack.
Betting against Bitcoin with ETH has had a 4000% gain so far. It is risky, but if you are heavily invested in Bitcoin already it might be a smart hedge.
Ethereum is solving an even bigger problem - it must have *every* user validate the entire state of everything that executes. This means that validating is much more complex, since you are actually *executing* the programs. For example, if you were trying to set a variable to P/Q, you'd have to calculate that and it would be slow. But if you just needed to verify that P/Q = M, you could multiply M*Q and confirm it's P very quickly. You are asking all computers to compute P/Q rather than just verify an answer in ethereum.
Their chain is growing incredibly fast, and it's only a matter of time before no one is able to catch up when synching from scratch. That's why the move is to partner with data centers and other centralized servers to do the "computation". After that, you are just trusting them, which is useless compared to a centralized server.
Sidechains and LN have nothing to do with The DAO, and the fundamental problem in Ethereum is the complexity of its language (funny - something I brought up to Vitalik 3 years ago and he brushed off). The white-hat attack is being counter attacked, and they are screwed, they'll roll it back. BTW, there is no *hack*. Hack implies unauthorized access. There is no such thing as unauthorized access in a smart contract. This was a legitimate user taking funds he was entitled to.
If I want to hedge against Bitcoin with fiat, I'll stick to the dollar, not Vitalikoin.