So much fail in this thread, don't have time to deal with it all. I'll start here, where the basic criticism is correct but a lot of incorrect information is in here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurious
Dude you are an idiot, like a lot of people who are into bitcoins.
30'000 Bitcoins valued at 17.3M were auctioned.
If we a) expect the price of the auction was higher than the current bitcoins price (this seems to be the expectation here, no?) and b) know something about auctions, we know that we had a demand multiple of 2 or less.
Government debt routinely has a higher multiple than that.
The guy is full of **** and as someone said we dont even know how high his bid was.
Those 20M are obviously not in the market. Given that this was the first auction of bitcoins (at least at that amount), there were probably a lot of people who were probably bidding 30-90% of the current market price (I expect that number to be at 70-80% of unfulfilled demand probably even more). On top the bitcoins market is still avoided by big investors which leads me to believe that a lot of people were putting in bids for small lots at rather cheap prices.
You lack fundamental knowledge of how auctions and supply and demand works. Silbert can bid all he wants.
Has the order book been made public? Otherwise there is no ****ing way he could know how many people bid how much and how high real demand is.
And assuming that auction price > current market price the demand at the new price will be even lower.
Now, please show me in which area I need to do more research.
Spurious mostly right, but there is very real chance someone paid "above market" for the coins. Keep in mind that the market is not very liquid now and involves shady exchanges. Someone wishing to purchase a large amount of coins could very well get a better value buying a bit over market in an auction than trying to buy on an exchange. Of course, places that are interested in acquiring coins are likely hooked in with Coinbase and Bitpay to get their coins. Also keep in mind the price dropped pretty synchronously with the announcement of the auction, so a lot was priced in, and paying in between the old price and the "current" price might have been a great deal in this respect, as there isn't huge liquidity and a lot of panic sellers.
People putting in lowball bids is obviously Silbert trying to get a rally going. Wonder if he just overbid whatever the syndicate put in and that's why the syndicate lost. Silbert knows what the people who were part of the syndicate bid and if they won or lost.
The $20M on the market comment is also intentionally misleading. They want to drum up interest and excitement. Though the extreme that it's completely useless is also misleading. This wasn't a freeroll auction, people had to register and put up $200K as a deposit to make a bid. Now many could have been complete lowball bids, but many clearly were not. The format of the auction made a big incentive not to screw around too much with a super low bid. There was demand for coins, but at what kind of discount? We'll never know unless the auction data comes out somehow.
The idea from onemoretimes that the coins didn't even sell is also laughable and about as idiotic as the guy who claimed they'd sell for $1800. Don't even know where to get started with him.