Quote:
Originally Posted by ThinkItThrough
@ Alt-coin debate:
(I am just thinking loud / ramble and have to admit i am somewhat clueless on the detailed technical part of BTC. Please show me where i am wrong, i want to understand the logic better )
We often hear the argument that "if anybody comes up with a superior feature, BTC can integrate it". I do not agree. Theoretically this is possible, but i am not sure about the practicality. When starting new companies many noobs always say "but google/facebook could build this in one day". The fact is they don't and they can't especially if its high risk and controversial. I do see a parallel to Bitcoin. Once its big, it will behave like all big organisms. There's nothing inherently bad about it, but assuming BTC will instantly implement a superior is incorrect.
Lets say Gavin Andersen/ The foundation slowly build features into BTC that cooperate in a nice way with the US gvmt that people will not love, but where its not that bad that they will "revolt". Sort of like the boiling frog analogy.
If you say "but the miners and people of the world wont accept it" , then i beg to differ. There are commercial interests already and they will bow to regulators. Every person here with a decent position in BTC will also bow to regulators out of economic self-interest.
In short, i think BTC is as flexible as democratic elected governments. You have the illusion that you can "vote for change" and in theory that is true. But in practise, people hate changes that and i expect the same thing to happen with BTC.
==========================
Here is where i see a chance for an altcoin, but that is in the far far future. I have only superficial knowledge of altcoins and i stay out of them cuz i simply have no clue.
I just don't think they are totally worthless, but atm also don't see any superior functionality.
Thoughts?
You make a good point that bitcoin won't be able to jump on new features as dynamic as it should and maybe not jump at all.
However, the mainstream application for bitcoin is really just sending and receiving money.
Creditcards were invented in the 50s and they didn't change to much.
There is a lot room for improvement in usablitiy for Bitcoin but that is all on the Client side.
Its like the 3.5mm chinch its has a long history, and companies tried change the market with propriatary connectors but ultimately it survived and is now common in every electronic device, and I don't see that to change anytime soon.
Actually there very even innovations around that, added mic and player controls.
This is a good example of a very standard that is just used for a very simple thing listing to music vs. sending receiving money.
But like on bitcoin the shape wasn't change, the innovation were made ontop of the shape.
Nowdays, you can attach Creditcard reader, light sensors, windspeed sensors and all kinds of stuff on that 3.5mm audiojack.