Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
BFI Moderation BFI Moderation

11-10-2017 , 09:36 AM
Banning TS makes me think you are a brutallu incompetent set of moderators. He provided way more content than 99% of posters.

Agree with baseball, moderators have done well here only tourists cause issues and augie is terrible.

Also, the OP sounds like a guy who takes his mod job waaaaay too serious and needs to get out a little more.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 09:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredSocial
If your conclusion is that TS is a terrible poster you need new metrics. As a BFI poster he's been outstanding. His contributions to the trading threads has been pretty serious.
+1

Juk
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 09:56 AM
also, for god's sake unban toothsayer. wtf is wrong with people?
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by syndr0me
Banning TS makes me think you are a brutallu incompetent set of moderators. He provided way more content than 99% of posters.

Agree with baseball, moderators have done well here only tourists cause issues and augie is terrible.

Also, the OP sounds like a guy who takes his mod job waaaaay too serious and needs to get out a little more.
Ha, I can assure you I don't take it very seriously, lol.

My OP was definitely intended to be serious however, because obviously a lot of people would object to TS' ban. And I figured we could open up a discussion on tone of posting...because it does irritate me when people come off as arrogant jerks. *shrug* Maybe it doesn't bother anyone else, but my concern assumed that might drive off more reasonable posters.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
I/We've been struggling a while with the way that some of the discussions in BFI seem to devolve to the point where they are completely unproductive. We have some posters that are really active here that just seem to take either totally extremist views or are incapable of any kind of objectivity. Along with that, we have people who just seem to come across as total arrogant jerks, which is just not the professional/civil/friendly/helpful tone I personally would like to see here.

I personally have struggled with trying to figure out where the line is crossed, so have typically erred on the side of allowing discussion and hoping that things sort of self-policed. I have definitely chimed in from time to time with a 'knock it off', but I wonder if we've done that enough to promote good discussion. My real fear here is that the extremist part of the discussion ends up dominating and making it no fun for the more reasonable posters.

So...all that being said, we'll try making more of an effort to try prevent this kind of ridiculousness. Would love feedback or suggestions. In the spirit of what I've just expressed, let's keep that feedback friendly and constructive.
Honestly, there are 5 posters on 2+2 right now that I know of that are worth the other 500.

TS is one of them.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:10 AM
Just to clarify one of the biggest posters in this thread is a banned posters gimmick account... And we're talking about whether we should burn TS at the stake. Wil I'm sorry to make an example of you, but you're the PERFECT example of how backwards this whole situation is.

Anyone who looks at TS's body of work and think he should be banned needs to be demodded. Today. They have completely lost any semblance of objectivity and are actively making the site substantially worse. Remember the last job Phil Jackson had and why he got fired? This is that. The Mods who think this is a bad idea collectively aren't worth half of what one legitimately good poster is worth.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:12 AM
Let ASAP and tooth have their trade war! If he wins, he's back in.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredSocial
Just to clarify one of the biggest posters in this thread is a banned posters gimmick account... And we're talking about whether we should burn TS at the stake. Wil I'm sorry to make an example of you, but you're the PERFECT example of how backwards this whole situation is.
I don't understand what you are talking about here, Bored. If it was up to my account or TS's, I'd take his in a heartbeat.

Please, do the right thing and unban him and ban me forever.

And, I'm not a "gimmick". I never hid a ****ing thing.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagashi3
I don't understand what you are talking about here, Bored. If it was up to my account or TS's, I'd take his in a heartbeat.

Please, do the right thing and unban him and ban me forever. He's worth 50 of me.
You'd be back . My biggest issue with you has always been that you're kind of a fish. Watching your trades all these years has been a bit tilting sometimes. It's alright though, you're a good weathervane of what normalish upper middle class guys from Pittsburgh are thinking on any given day. Not the worst demo to poll IMO.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:25 AM
Okay...so I've formally requested that TS be unbanned, even if he's exiled from the other forums where there is a problem. I don't have any comment/opinion on those, because I don't read those forums or understand his body of work outside of BFI.

Chill out on the 'omg mods so dumb', because you may not be aware of whatever body of work exists either. Sometimes things are grey and sometimes after feedback, positions change or compromises are found.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredSocial
You'd be back . My biggest issue with you has always been that you're kind of a fish.
I've never claimed I wasn't.

Quote:
Watching your trades all these years has been a bit tilting sometimes.
And? They've tilted my own self.

Quote:
It's alright though, you're a good weathervane of what normalish upper middle class guys from Pittsburgh are thinking on any given day. Not the worst demo to poll IMO.
Philadelphia.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagashi3
I've never claimed I wasn't.



And? They've tilted my own self.



Philadelphia.
And you're from a ****ty freight market? Ban plz.

EDIT: Yeah the most redeeming thing about you is that you've been willing to post stuff that makes you look bad over the years actually. That kind of transparency isn't that common. I'm nowhere near that brave most of the time. Well until recently. I don't know when I stopped caring, but it was sometime around 30.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
Chill out on the 'omg mods so dumb', because you may not be aware of whatever body of work exists either. Sometimes things are grey and sometimes after feedback, positions change or compromises are found.
No, that's not true. No one thinks "omg mods so dumb". We are only asking why you don't take a position. Is it because you are scared?

Of course it is. Everyone reading this thread knows that. You are asking instead of demanding, which the other side is doing.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredSocial
And you're from a ****ty freight market? Ban plz.

EDIT: Yeah the most redeeming thing about you is that you've been willing to post stuff that makes you look bad over the years actually. That kind of transparency isn't that common. I'm nowhere near that brave most of the time. Well until recently. I don't know when I stopped caring, but it was sometime around 30.
Yeah? Wait until you're 40.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagashi3
No, that's not true. No one thinks "omg mods so dumb". We are only asking why you don't take a position. Is it because you are scared?

Of course it is. Everyone reading this thread knows that. You are asking instead of demanding, which the other side is doing.
What are you talking about? I just took a position, lol.

My position is that TS should stay and be in BFI. My position is also that he should post without being a douchebag. That's been the same position I've had all along. That doesn't mean he didn't totally earn/deserve a ban for work outside of BFI...I'm completely ignorant of that. I'm going to give other moderators the benefit of the doubt and assume their decisions were for the good of the site.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
My position is that TS should stay and be in BFI. My position is also that he should post without being a douchebag. That's been the same position I've had all along. That doesn't mean he didn't totally earn/deserve a ban for work outside of BFI...I'm completely ignorant of that. I'm going to give other moderators the benefit of the doubt and assume their decisions were for the good of the site.
This is the most incoherent thing I've seen in years on 2+2. "He should stay, but he's a douchebag. You've always thought that. He deserves a ban depending on the dickhead who thought that, but you are ignorant of that. Let everyone else decide."

wtf is even being said here?
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:44 AM
This thread seems to be shedding light on a problem.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:48 AM
This isn't the first time he's been banned and it won't be the last. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:55 AM
Can a mod explain to all of us why wil was allowed to shut down (was banned?) with his old account and is posting under a new name (Dagashi3)? Even if he is masking his IP or whatever, it's clearly him and if we are going to ban someone like TS, he should be included given what he does to every thread he's involved in.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASAP17
Can a mod explain to all of us why wil was allowed to shut down (was banned?) with his old account and is posting under a new name (Dagashi3)? Even if he is masking his IP or whatever, it's clearly him and if we are going to ban someone like TS, he should be included given what he does to every thread he's involved in.

Given that he's made it quite clear who he is, the acct should be banned.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Out of context. Read the whole thing and the meaning is clear.

In no way am I saying that I agree or disagree with bans for strawmans. Only that the recent statements by mason call for such.
Where are these statements by Mason? I love a good Mason rant.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 11:16 AM
jal,

I think you do a good job and the best of the BFI moderators. (Low bar considering a rampant history of just outright crooks.)

I'm saddened at the passing of TS. My performance autistry (Montecoco tm) is mostly a duet.

NB: I know you think I'm a tool. Iz k.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 11:19 AM
Yeah come on unban Toothsayer. I disagree with him plenty of times, but overall he adds value here. If you really get triggered by his posts you need thicker skin.
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
Okay...so I've formally requested that TS be unbanned, even if he's exiled from the other forums where there is a problem. I don't have any comment/opinion on those, because I don't read those forums or understand his body of work outside of BFI.

Chill out on the 'omg mods so dumb', because you may not be aware of whatever body of work exists either. Sometimes things are grey and sometimes after feedback, positions change or compromises are found.
Thanks!
BFI Moderation Quote
11-10-2017 , 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Where are these statements by Mason? I love a good Mason rant.
I thought I linked it in my earlier post.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/5...lines-1695403/

and here is the backstory. its pretty good tbh. eh, mebbe not.

mason banned the dude for this post: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1344

and justified it here: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1361

and announced it here:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1383

anyway, the cliffs is that mason came in to a decently trafficked strategy forum full of regs and some really really sharp posters and ended up permabanning at least 1 reg and is currently considering another perman. he also gave week long bans to 2 others.
BFI Moderation Quote

      
m