Quote:
Originally Posted by kjb329
Apple is the most ridiculously mispriced megacap stock ever possible. Lets do some quick maths. $366B market cap, probably up to $150b in cash, last year earned 50b, ex cash trades at a 4 p/e. Even if apple loses half its earnings its selling for an 8 pe. 3/4 of their earnings 16 pe. You get the point. Is that really possible? I love my apple products, and i'm sure many of you do too or at least have friends who do. And they are clearly the best tablet maker, which is the future of personal computing.
A stock trading at a quarter of the markets multiple, a leader in its industry, earns insane margins(granted which are due to drop), so earnings go to 25b in 3 years slap a 12 multiple on that (apple probably really deserves higher), they earn 80b over next two years, 300b+150b+80b=530B
and thats in a disaster scenario, what if they continue to kill it? even in the worst case they are worth 47% more in intrinsic value...the best case? lets just leave that as a free option Most mispriced megacap EVER.
I'm not going to opine on whether AAPL is underpriced - though my analysis from earlier (
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=265) seems even more relevant now. But either way, this line of thinking is why a lot of investors lose money.
No company, especially not a proud, iconic company with a huge legacy to live up to is going to be run with an eye towards saving a few petty dollars for its shareholders. The chance is that if there's a war for market dominance and Apple is on the losing end, Apple isn't going to return cash to the shareholders or downsize to a niche in which it can be competitive and fight for another day. It's going to risk massive losses to prove itself, its vision and its past. In the worst cases, various divisions will fight for the right to lose more money. In such circumstances, cash doesn't belong to you, especially when the company is too big for any investor to take over and too delicate for outsiders to run.
It's like random Japanese people at the beginning of World War II thinking, what's the worst that could happen, we give up some pacific islands we invaded and go back to being a dominant Pan-Asian empire with a huge military clout over the rest of Asia.
I've also explained this before, but unlike Microsoft or Google, Apple has no stable stream of revenue to count upon that's protected by a monopoly or a monopoly-like market dominance. Very few people are meaningfully locked into Apple products, nor do they have substantial edge over others in terms of technology and infrastructure (as is the case for many of Google's and Microsoft's products). In this sense, they are much more comparable to Nokia, RIMM, Nintendo and Sony than Google, Microsoft, Oracle and IBM. A couple of bad product cycles can easily destroy the underlying profitability.