Quote:
Originally Posted by Brass
I'm skeptical that this is true--that they changed it. I don't think they said that--I think they just stated that testing only those with pneumonia is their protocol, and they didn't clarify whether that's what they've been doing all along.
Of course you're skeptical - you're on the wrong side of absolutely everything. On the 6th of Feb (Chinese time) they
issued an edict stating that confirmed cases will be only cases with symptoms (which they define as pneumonia). This is precisely when the new cases started declining.
Quote:
In a notice issued by China's National Health Commission (NHC) on Feb. 6, it wrote that the classification of new Wuhan virus infections will be divided into four categories: "suspected cases," "clinically diagnosed cases," "confirmed cases," and "positive tests." Among these, "positive tests" refers to "asymptomatic infected patients" who test positive for the disease but have no symptoms.
At the same time they started a
lockdown of "rumor mongering", arresting citizen journalists who were reporting on how bad it really is in Wuhan, and ordering their press that negative stories should be removed/only positive stories about how they were winning the fight.
China's infection numbers are worthless at this point. They mean nothing. Deaths are still reliable as a comparison, but are of course (and have been) grossly underreported, perhaps by 2-4x. The NYT has written extensively about numerous cases of people dying at home from fever and pneumonia without being tested, turned away from all hospitals, and then simply cremated. Its not a conspiracy, it's just the reality of overwhelmed health services having limited test kits and having to triage. The younger relatives catch the disease too but survive.
Quote:
Do you think they recently changed how they are counting deaths, also? Because those are down today also (which I predicted, using my unbiased brain).
This is like your "almost linear" mathematical illiteracy from earlier. Data including last count (Feb 11):
My working assumption as far as trading goes is to treat the Chinese numbers as accurate - because the market will - and continue to realize that it has a fat very negative tail.
Last edited by ToothSayer; 02-12-2020 at 01:22 PM.