I clearly didnt start it. Per usual someone else did. Im just asking questions?

Why didnt someone say this when the poster who brought this up posted his grand statements?

Literally every thread that poster is in, turns into an argument about said poster, and personal attack. Thats off topic. Every time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

"The special counsel and the Justice Department ought to be allowed to finish their work in a professional manner," McConnell said.

Is TS "he who shall not be named" now?

I wasn't even responding to your post so dunno why you are being defensive.

For intelligent people y'all should understand that discussing politics is for sheep.

Yeah McConnell has never spun his words for his own (and his donors) personal gain.

And yeah, says the guy who is discussing politics on a forum. Sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FFS, reading politics here is almost as tilting as reading Shuffle's page-long drivels.

Is there any edge at looking at ETF inflows/outflows? The inflow/outflow data is delayed by a day. And wouldn't real time price capture that data in some form?

It's interesting nonetheless. I'm going to see if I can download all of this data and make sense out of it.

Also, article below shows as how one trader moved hundreds of millions from HYG and JNK into USHY, but I don't see it in the flows:
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/one-junk...rade-1.1233167

https://www.etf.com/etfanalytics/etf-fund-flows-tool

Stop coming on every time rates have a small recovery after going down everyday for a couple weeks. The only thing clear is you have no clue what you are talking about.

It's lucky I wouldn't have taken a bet that I never proposed, agreed to, was ridiculous in that in had NOTHING to do with the OP which you said had 70% of happening (S&P to 1900 by January 31) and later claimed was for sure happening? You've been wrong on almost everything for years, if we had an inverse on your calls we'd all be rich... it's that incredible.

Speaking of China pump, I'm long the market this week

However, there's nothing stopping the Fed from cutting rates to zero or even negative in response to a stock market crash. As that will collapse the 3mo, the 10y will also collapse with it, at least initially until it explodes upwards if stagflation is your scenario.

If you want to play stagflation, why not just wait for treasuries to spike/gold to plummet after the market crash and the rate cuts, and then buy gold/short treasuries?

Basically, you are calling for the 10y rates to rise even in the face of ZIRP/NIRP and central bank manipulation right from the get go, but looking at all the other countries that have initiated NIRP like Japan, Germany, Switzerland, etc., that just doesn't seem all that likely.

Just a reminder the 10y was around 2.7-2.75 here and topped two days later, brilliant.

What bear market? Because they aren't at absolute lows? Back up the chart, if you think bonds are in a real bear market you are insane. We keep going round and round because you just can't admit your fundamental take AND prices have (so far) confirmed the opposite. I mean to say that German and Japan 10y being negative doesn't affect the demand for US yield is also insane. You don't get ahead of a freight train which is what is happening around the world as central banks get even more dovish.

Long AVGR .98. Junk bonds keep breaking out high beta looks good LIKe BABA

Wtf? I said myself that 2.5% was too rich (see below). You're a total clown. Funny how you disappear 9/10 days the market goes against you, and back the 1/10 day the market catches its breathe. You don't think what you're doing isn't obvious? Don't come back until the 10 year is anywhere near 5%.

And how's the BA trade doing?

Dude doesn't get markets, whatsoever.

But being wrong 100% of the time is a skill in and of itself. He reminds of this episode of Numb3rs, where a psychic has to guess the color of the first 20 (?) cards of a shuffled deck. He got them all exactly wrong lol.

I reported someone. Guess who? Here was my message:

AMD is getting short squeezed pretty hard today. They are pumped right now but have a lot going for them. I'm taking various calls 1+week out and will look for spots to sell before exp

If you were looking into the mirror and reading this aloud, it would be amazing self reflection and step 1 on your path to redemption.

What's funny is your last post talking **** marked the lowest level for FB (was trading ~$159) since the last earnings report and its added a few SNAPs in market cap. Your fundemental takes are still bad and that's despite the run SNAP has been on.

I said long term and you took a two week SNAPshot. For you, long term is obviously like 2 seconds since you feed off of toaster leavin's. FB is a grease trap waiting for a spark. Can FB break $200 before hitting $125 again? Sure looks like it. Doesn't make that any less of a terrible long term position. And also doesn't negate which of these companies still has more upside which gets back to the original issue of growth

Lol and if we go long term SNAP is still down an absurd amount from its IPO/a lot of the shareholder base decently under water so don't be a hypocrite. The point is your takes specifically on FB have been wrong pretty much the whole time so really no room to say much of anything.

Also it's hilarious how you started responding to this then abandoned it and had to come back. Lmao.

You cannot move the goal posts every time you try and assert yourself as anything other than an otter. Are we using FB's ipo as the basis for it being a great long term investment right now? You smell funny even through the screen.

Last October is when this started, and that's where the measurements begin for the purposes of our argument. I won't regurgitate those same fundamentals you dismiss, but still hold true; the only thing that matters is I'm outperforming you by a wide margin since then and ytd.

FB is a great long term investment and SNAP isn't both historically and going forward. The conversation has been going on a lot longer than last October (we've been talking about SNAP on here since it went public) but nice try to move the goal posts yourself, hypocrite. It's been a nice trade off the absolute lows but price doesn't mean the fundementals have changed IMO so we'll just agree to disagree.

In October, we started debating which was a better play moving forward, SNAP or FB. I'm not using any other parameters here, you are. Again, you're calling me a hypocrite in a new thread without any substance to your accusation. We cannot be in disagreement because that would imply we share some level of intelligence. It's like me disagreeing with a baboon.