that whole article comes off as a cringey desperate attempt to buy something that they stand to gain for touting, almost gold bug esque.
macro commodities are incredibly hard to predict, highly influenced by dollar movement, and a major part of commodities as a whole is the energy sector which of course is its own fun topic.
Quote:
After peaking at $37/bbl in September 2000, prices proceeded to pull back by over 50% in the next 12 months, in a wave of bearishness not unlike today (in retrospect, we know that selling spasm in oil presented investors with an incredible buying opportunity)
this whole quote is just lol, like just totally ignoring the fundamentals of why the pull backs happened and what has to happen for it to be such an incredible buying opportunity
if you want to make a broad commitment to commodities and energies as a whole, you have to have a strong and well thought out opinion on refiners and production costs measured against shale plus demand, you don't just go "herp derp oh look at the charts here compared to the charts there, ez game"
if anything the article, to me anyways, is just calling for a tightening of the spread of equities against commodities. to me that's more just commentary on the heat in equities and less the bearishness in commodities. one could bet the spread but really it's just the dollar more than anything else imo.