Quote:
Originally Posted by ASAP17
It's always really funny to me when people who have never been apart of something suddenly insert themselves for the sole purpose of pointing out what's wrong with it.
That's not what I did, I asked, effectively, what's right with it. The negative things I said were supporting why I asked the question, but I was asking a question.
And I rejected one poor answer to that question, explaining why I rejected it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToothSayer
I haven't found a single forum worth reading for ideas except 2p2.
Ok. There is the answer, or least
an answer.
It seems like you optimize for signal-to-noise ratio and you find this to be the best. Obviously there is higher quality content other places, you just may have to sift through a lot of **** to find it.
Twitter would be example. I know, I know. "Twitter blows!" or whatever. What you're saying is that there is a lot of crap on Twitter. But it's not ALL crap. Some of the smartest people in the world Tweet daily. If you still want to try and claim there is 0 valuable content ever shared on Twitter you are biased beyond the ability to have a rational discussion.
We all optimize for different things I guess. I don't mind digging for gold.
(I don't use Twitter, it was just the most-defensible example I could think of)