Quote:
Originally Posted by Regret$
Marston, nice post, but you have to understand most of us kids are playing 15 tables at a time, so live play is not as good as study for learning spots. Likely if you can't put someone on a range from the live play then study is a waste. But study and play go hand in hand today, and lots of it is numbers of tables we are playing.
I strongly believe that Marstons post is true, in the sense that nothing imparts more knowledge to someone than having their own money on the line, one game, staring across the table seeing the opponent, and then having to ACTUALLY utilize all of the intangible reads of a person....
However, i believe that this must be coupled with Regrets point of knowing the numbers. If for only understanding where they aggro-aggressive young bucs, are going to 3 or 4 bet you to death.. or just 'randomly' [to the oldtimers] shove OOP [out of position.]
I believe it would be folly, in any endeavor, TO NOT TRY TO amass the same info of the time that your opponent will have. Because If you yous Regret's point and have the knowledge base, then the even more invaluable skills that Marston is pointing out are SO MUCH EASIER TO USE.... because you can understand if someone is strictly playing percentages then you can really out think them by using the rest of the skills that makes live games so much more fun/difficult/interesting/exciting....