Quote:
Originally Posted by HeeHaw!!
Just the other day, I looked up a hand where he time banked and got stacks in vs me. I would think if he is rtaing certain hands, he would for sure be rtaing this one (big pot vs winning reg). He absolutely butchered it, and he's butchered plenty others (compared to the solver). But my ranges in Pio are likely at least slightly different than his ranges in gtow which will shift evs. I also think it would be nearly impossible to be looking up hands regularly during hands while mass tabling. Mass tabling also explains the time banking. But what do I know? 8-tabling would drive me nuts, personally. But the s4y thing is sketchy. And it does seem that he's mixing more lines/sizings than all the other regs by far, which the solver would do, but part of that might be my imagination (for instance, he is simplifying, but using drastically different sizings than the field in many spots), but I wouldn't call that strong evidence. Do we know for sure he is the same guy on Stars?
It's bc he's not RTA'ing. GTOw admin ran the hands through their backend and 7 of the 8 hands were false positives (ie, the configurations looked up via GTOw viewer were MTT/diff stack depths). Not to mention, they admitted GTOw's "FPC" flags false positives in cash games at a rate upwards of 30%. My personal chat w/ said admin: