Quote:
Originally Posted by RosaParks1
It is simple to see the difference between a post from Handofgod with fairly damning database info and a guy questioning why he "always GETS AA AND THEN LOSES TO 57o ITS CRAZY THIS SITE RIGGED."
If you don't think I differ in my responses to people like HandOfGod666 or MCAChiTown, and posters like you describe above, I'm not sure what to tell you other than you should probably have a better handle on someone's posting history before calling them out for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosaParks1
If you play there, you would notice this quickly, and if you don't play there, you shouldn't be disputing people's claims anyway.
Which is probably why I don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosaParks1
This level of evidence and consistent complaining from the community does not bely a great conspiracy to incriminate an innocent player pool. The consistent defense is frustrating and is something the community in general gets further exhausted by. It is one thing to be the victim of a crime; it is far worse to not have it acknowledged. You don't have to acknowledge it, but when you pop up on the other side consistently, you have to eat the frowns that come your way as you have picked a side.
I'm not sure where this narrative of yours about picking a side comes from. It seems that you've fallen into the "if you're not with us, you're against us!" trap. If you can find a single post of mine where I've told someone who obviously knows what they're talking about WRT to bots and cheating that they are incorrect, I'd be pretty surprised. Actually, I'm not even sure I've done that with any rigged conspiracists. What I will do a lot of the time is ask people to produce evidence, or if I see flaws in their logic, I'll point those out. Sometimes I'll suggest alternative possibilities, as I did with Joey and super users. Doing so isn't "picking sides". It would be pretty foolish of me to take a side when I haven't shared the experience of the poster in question. But poorly researched claims don't help anyone, and in fact I think they hurt the cause of those who have done their homework, so I'll never apologize for questioning them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosaParks1
Winning_TD is an employee of the site. We have been asking an employee to do something they have consistently said is not in their power, and then furthermore we have been asking them to be on our side with the villification of their employer. It's a tough spot is my point, and as far as other requests, he gets things done and is responsive so although I would love a magic bot-catching tournament director, that may just not be something he's able to do at this time. I will only throw tomatos at a wall for so long before I accept it is not going to fall over. We need assistance on these matters but at least he is fixing problems within his grasp is my point.
Agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosaParks1
I cited you and kahn because to my knowledge you're not employees and are veterans of the 2+2 community. You don't have to admit a bot problem exists or change anything about your posts, but also, you should understand why it is disappointing to not have such respected veterans on the side of the community and why it would be perceived that way.
TBH, when I reread this, it pisses me off a bit.
How do you think it came about that the whole conversation with WPN started, that led to the email from Mason that they never responded to? FreshThyme started an ATF thread about the issue, which I then took to my WPN contacts. Subsequently, there were discussions between Mason, Mat, and I, and others, which ultimately led to the email and then the decision to end things - a decision I fully supported, and a decision that cost both 2+2 and I a substantial amount of money. I've never asked for, or thought I should receive, any praise for this, because it was simply the right thing to do, and there have been other times that I have made money from an advertiser that in the end didn't work out well for our members. But when you tell me I'm not "on the side of the community" WRT to a site where I was involved in and supported a decision that was what the community wanted and cost me personally, I find it a little aggravating.