Quote:
Originally Posted by Poker Clif
Usually I am on the side of the complainers. But regarding the ACR tournament structures, I have to be selfish and disagree.
When I was just starting out playing on PokerStars (2007 I think), I final-tabled a 4,200-player micro tournament and won 116 buy-ins. I've loved long tournaments with a chance to win a lot of money ever since.
Now I'm a full-time poker player, and whether it's live (mostly) or online (occasionally) I always look for the best structure. I want to have big enough stacks to raise speculative hands from early position and have a chance of catching and getting a big payoff against a big poket pair.
If I know I'm going to play a tournament in the evening, I usually arrange my schedule so that I can sleep in until noon. I'm very aware that a lot of players get tired after several hours--because they're dumb enough to tell me.
When I play a live tournament that starts at 7 P.M., and at 11 P.M. players are whining about how tired they are and talking about a multiway chop, to me that translates as, "We're too tired, you got this Clif." I love it when someone 30 years younger than I is whining about being tired!
I understand that I'm in the minority here, and since I usually only play one ACR tournament a month (mostly just to see if WPN is ever going to be fixed) maybe I shouldn't even have a vote. But I won't play anything but Big Ten tournaments on ACR, and the structure is the one and only reason. If it takes 12 hours of play to have a chance to win > 100 buy-ins, bring it on!
But for now, until the DOS problem is solved, I'll probably stay off the site for a month or so, then see where things stand. Maybe they can fix one of the other problems too. That would be really nice.
Poker Clif -- I agree with you about the tourney structure. The shorter the rounds, the quicker the tournament degrades into a shovefest where true poker skills have to be left behind.
As to the DOS problem: it is much more likely a DDOS [distributed denial of service] DNS-based amplification attack. These can be difficult to defend against. However there are commercial companies that provide this service by:
1. Proxying your web access so the attacks are against the protection company's servers, not yours.
2. The DDOS protection services typically have very high bandwidth -- higher than you do.
3. The DDOS are experts in thwarting the attack using sophisticated techniques that less knowledgeable sites would employ.
Of course these services ain't cheap. But that's probably the cost a site like WPN must bear to keep their operation running smoothly. I highly recommend that they investigate this technique.
http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=13446