What's your point? What does it matter how many skins there are? The numbers we're talking about concern the network, which is comprised of all skins.

Do you even know what planet you're standing on right now?

I don't really understand why you're posting in here other than to argue and troll me so I'll just go ahead and report your post as well. You aren't contributing anything.

Current Cash Game Players:

Revolution: 86

Party Borgata (NJ): 115

Why would we have Revolution, which is also invite only to ALL US PLAYERS, in this thread?

You used the fact that Intertops is invite only to support your argument that Revolution should not be listed. The fact that there are other skins available weakens that support. Let me know if the logic is not clear to you now.

Revolution isn't invite only to "ALL US PLAYERS".

My original assertion was that Intertops (and ANY Revolution network) should not be listed in this thread's upcoming update as it has the least traffic of any US facing network.

None of your posts address that in any way, shape, or form. What do you hope to accomplish here other than to troll?

As said, reported for trolling.

So Juicy Stakes should be in the thread? Obviously not. So what are we arguing about here?

This is ridiculous. You guys will literally argue with ANYTHING I say. It's unreal.

Fine, go ahead and put Revolution, the lowest populated US facing network, in the updated thread. Nobody's going to play there, obviously.

Here is a post that addresses it. Your argument is to remove the site/network with the lowest traffic. Once it is removed, there will be a new lowest. Your same argument will have that site/network removed, and so on.

I didn't say anything either way about whether they should or should not be listed (although I do believe they should).

What I did do what correct a(nother) error that you made.

/facepalm

Absolutely unbelievable.

Nothing...just forget it. I tried to be helpful again and all I got was a bunch of people who nobody would ever even pay attention to away from this forum arguing with me over nothing.

As said - Make SURE you put Revolution and it's 80 cash game players at peak in the updated thread. That will make it look really good.

Not sure what to tell you.. stop being wrong so often.

Unable to restate your argument so it doesn't fail?

This post, once again, has absolutely nothing to do with anything.

Reported again. Let's see if I can get a third or fourth person banned from here today.

Let me get this straight. You think a site shouldn't be listed in the update of US facing sites not because it no longer faces the US but because of low traffic?

THAT'S IDIOTIC!

The question addressed in this thread is "Where can US players play?" not "Which sites are the biggest sites for US players?"

Thus if US players can play there, I, for one, as a US player, want to know about it. (Especially if Marylanders like myself can play there)

So - can US players play on Revolution? Yes? They belong here. No? They don't belong here. It seems pretty clear...

another /facepalm. What are you TALKING about?

It does face the US. We actually have people arguing with me that it does it more than I'm even suggesting. What are you TALKING about?

As for the other half of your mess here: It shouldn't be listed on the thread for numerous reasons, right. What are we arguing about here? What difference does it make what the reason is for it to not be listed? It shouldn't be put up there - Great, let's move on.

You guys are arguing with me about absolutely nothing. Pure air.

So you now want the list to contain ANY network that a US player CAN play on? Well, that was never how the thread was constructed in the first place. If you want to go that route, obviously that's fine with me but then that brings a whole slew of sites that next to nobody plays on into the mix. See what I'm saying?

This list never included certain networks. Still, your point does solidify my original one which has been deleted in this thread at this point which was that the thread itself sorely needed an update.

Typically, if someone suggests something like that on a forum and it has enough agreement in the community so that the change is to be implemented, they're not argued with and treated as I am. Sometimes, someone even actually says "+1" or "good idea" or "thanks".

Just a thought and once again, why so many people out there absolutely hate 2p2 and those who post on it.

Legally, yes.

I submit that the OP disagrees with you:

Further, when bitcoin options were pointed out as being valid for US players, they were also added. So it seems to me that the INTENT of this thread was to list all legal options, not just the big ones.

That you want the list to be exclusive to larger networks? On what grounds?

By design or omission? I think you may be assuming design where simple omission explains it without any volitional inaction on the thread's managers.

Agreed - and it has been updated from time to time - like when they added bitcoin sites.

You very well may be right. If that's the case, though, the OP had this list entirely incomplete from the get go. Still, if the community would like the list to include everything, as said...that's fine with me. It's probably better that way in the end now that I think about it.

As for you saying that "legally" all playable sites should be listed: What do you mean? What legal obligation is 2p2 under here to provide a thread that lists all possible options?

I am talking about the post of yours that I quoted. Please keep up.

How do you know how the list was constructed originally? Are you a previously banned poster come back to haunt us under a new name?

I think it's extremely interesting that you would jump to that conclusion when there is absolutely no evidence of such, nor does my assumption about the thread lend credence to that speculation whatsoever. Since I know of two people who were banned today for doing the exact same thing, I can only assume that you drew this conclusion as it's common practice for people to do that on 2p2.

I drew my conclusion that the thread was never intended to be all inclusive in the first place simply because it never was all inclusive. Obviously, I gave the site and this thread too much credit originally.

He certainly exhibits many traits similar to a former troll that plagued the old Merge subforum (and probably others) under many accounts with repeated bannings.

Here are my suggestions for this thread.

1) Split it into two. One part would be a sticky listing ALL US facing sites, without regard to traffic, with an indication of what states cannot play. The other part would generally be a discussion thread for sites not having their own section/thread.

2) The part listing ALL US facing sites would be split into traditional sites and non-traditional sites. Traditional would be all sites where you deposit/cashout in dollars. Non-traditional would be bitcoin sites and sites like ClubWPT and WPTLeague.

3) I'd also like to see some section devoted to play money sites like Pokerstars, Full Tilt, and WSOP that are Android apps.

Maybe it was an oversight and not an intention. You have to forgive the non-admin mods because they are getting paid zero.

You can report without needing to make a post each time you do.

Congratulations on you associate degree and mensa membership. I stand in the shadow of your accomplishments.

I concur.

Not legal obligation, legally playable. As in, it's legal for a US player to play there.

Refer to the OP again. The OP lists sites where players may legally play. I do not think the OP should list sites where it is NOT legal (or possible due to site policies) for US players to play.