[Unibet] Official Thread
A normal leaderboard (based on the simple formula that you get 1 point for a win) would mean Player A plays 10 SnG and wins 8, Player B plays 100 SnG and wins 25, Player B is top of leaderboard with 25 points even though he's on winning 25% of his games, compared to 80% for Player A.
Using some sort of winrate formula (With a minimum games played to qualify at 20) you would have Player A play 20 SnG and win 5 (25% win rate) and player B plays 100 SnG and wins 25 (25%) and they both top the leaderboard. The tricky bit is working out a formula that doesn't punish players that play 100's of SnG because they're more likely to have to deal with variance over someone that runs hot in their first 20 games and then stops. I think the suggestions of splitting the league into buy-in or volume would help with this but having a cap on games counted seems unfair.
Using some sort of winrate formula (With a minimum games played to qualify at 20) you would have Player A play 20 SnG and win 5 (25% win rate) and player B plays 100 SnG and wins 25 (25%) and they both top the leaderboard. The tricky bit is working out a formula that doesn't punish players that play 100's of SnG because they're more likely to have to deal with variance over someone that runs hot in their first 20 games and then stops. I think the suggestions of splitting the league into buy-in or volume would help with this but having a cap on games counted seems unfair.
Re sng promos, the most fun one I played was on stars.fr; sponsored players (think they were amateurs on TV show) each have €10 bounty on them as added money, play was limited to a few peak hours and low stakes sng only.
This doesn't massively favour regs, rec players often play closer to correctly in these games, adds another element of strategy, and is fun.
This doesn't massively favour regs, rec players often play closer to correctly in these games, adds another element of strategy, and is fun.
Fresh BUG report:
badges are acting weird lately. they pop in and out for no reason, and today, when I turned the sound back ON in the options, all players at a table suddenly received badges (4 players same badge, and other 2 another badge). They also disappear later for no obvious reason.
btw, while on the subject, I really hope you will eventually make these badges more meaningful, things I'd like to see is pop-up description of badges, and that different aliases can have different badges.
badges are acting weird lately. they pop in and out for no reason, and today, when I turned the sound back ON in the options, all players at a table suddenly received badges (4 players same badge, and other 2 another badge). They also disappear later for no obvious reason.
btw, while on the subject, I really hope you will eventually make these badges more meaningful, things I'd like to see is pop-up description of badges, and that different aliases can have different badges.
RE: Rec-friendly SnG Leader Board Idea
Why not base it on a player's win percentage over every given 100 SnGs they play?
This would encourage people to play more to up their percentage in the NEXT 100 over what their win rate was over the last 100 while also not giving grinders an advantage as anyone (rec or pro) can have the best win percentage over any given set of 100 SnGs (playing more SnGs just gives the grinder more sets of 100 in which to up his percentage, but does not guarantee him anything).
You could also do it for each level of SnG: 1, 4, 10, 25, 50, and 100 which would allow more players to be more competitive in efforts at finishing with the highest win percentage for the SnG level in which they play.
Why not base it on a player's win percentage over every given 100 SnGs they play?
This would encourage people to play more to up their percentage in the NEXT 100 over what their win rate was over the last 100 while also not giving grinders an advantage as anyone (rec or pro) can have the best win percentage over any given set of 100 SnGs (playing more SnGs just gives the grinder more sets of 100 in which to up his percentage, but does not guarantee him anything).
You could also do it for each level of SnG: 1, 4, 10, 25, 50, and 100 which would allow more players to be more competitive in efforts at finishing with the highest win percentage for the SnG level in which they play.
But I don't exchange tickets that have already been partially played through.
Maybe i am gonna cut off my own profits by saying this, but....this is on the UKTour page;
So if a player has 4 packages for all events in the tour, i think it would be reasonable (justifiable) to not let them play anymore.
I actually expected the "left-over-tickets" to disappear, or maybe change them to like 1/4 of the value in bonus (so if you have all packages you are allowed to win, and you got 2x 100UK left, MAYBE exchange it into 50 Bonus.)
- Players can earn four packages per event.
- Packages cannot be exchanged for cash or any other online tickets.
- Packages won cannot be moved to alternative events.
So if a player has 4 packages for all events in the tour, i think it would be reasonable (justifiable) to not let them play anymore.
I actually expected the "left-over-tickets" to disappear, or maybe change them to like 1/4 of the value in bonus (so if you have all packages you are allowed to win, and you got 2x 100UK left, MAYBE exchange it into 50 Bonus.)
Yes, but that's the last time. The bonus has already been very extended.
I think that even without any effort to stop this, we wouldn't have as bad a ratio as other sites, because none of them are trying to stop it themselves, and our basic strategy will still go to work for us.
FYI there is a US facing poker site that works on that model called paynorake.com - the name is a throw-back to a previous business model. I think as a black-market site they have had "issues" related to cashouts in the past though I think not currently - so it's going to be hard to draw many relevant conclusions for you from it. I think this is a good idea BTW
Could you change my tickets to 10 euro MTT tickets if I can play the PLO tournies with them? If not NL5 Banzai tickets would do fine.
I have:
- 1x 10€ NL4 ticket (I used it a bit to try out the software, but it now has €12 so I assume its ok to change it for €10 worth of tickets..)
- 3x €1 Banzai tickets
- 3x €1 MTT tickets
- 8x €1 SNG tickets
Alias: WEloveANDREW
I have:
- 1x 10€ NL4 ticket (I used it a bit to try out the software, but it now has €12 so I assume its ok to change it for €10 worth of tickets..)
- 3x €1 Banzai tickets
- 3x €1 MTT tickets
- 8x €1 SNG tickets
Alias: WEloveANDREW
There's something that needs to be done about the opportunities to rathole on the site
I've noticed that when I'm switching tables, sometimes I will end up at the same table I was trying to move from. And when this happens I won't have to buy in for the amount I left with if I left with more than the max.
I've noticed that when I'm switching tables, sometimes I will end up at the same table I was trying to move from. And when this happens I won't have to buy in for the amount I left with if I left with more than the max.
Why do you think something needs to be done? I think it's a good thing as long as the minimum buy in isn't lowered. What is it now, 40? It allows players to leave and come back when they feel uncomfortable playing deep or want to put some of their stack in the 'bank' (then possibly use it to play more tables). Otherwise they might just leave the table and not come back. So i think it might encourage more action, and games to run.
I think that having to rejoin the same tables as the ones you left curbs table selection and regs constantly sitting in and leaving.
I think that having to rejoin the same tables as the ones you left curbs table selection and regs constantly sitting in and leaving.
The solution we came up with last time was to allow ratholing > 100bb, but not < 100bb. I think this solves all of the problems while keeping most of the benefit. This isn't built yet obviously, but I definitely want it.
Do you get this every time?
Thanks, I've passed this on to Robin, should be fixed now.
is it true, that Unibet only the sponsor of the twitch streams and If I want to know if the coverage will be moved back or not to wednesday (Sam's stream), than I have to ask the twitch administrator cos Unibet is not organiser or part of Twitch website? Unibet live chat's agent told me that and it sounds so weird.
Although we decide the schedule, it has to be on days that Sam is able to stream. That's why the schedule has changed a bit lately.
PLO 50 BB mnimum buy in ratholing stil has value, but it is already an improvement from 20 BB buy in. Making it 100 BB buy-in minimum and maximum would maybe be best, but there are probably arguments against that as it would have been done already somewhere.(like in Spanish casinos 20 years ago)
It's more of a problem in PLO because there're bigger advantages to playing short.
Turns out I have nothing better to do with my time so I came up with this as an example SnG leaderboard formula.
*Notes*
- Games played are based purely on random numbers I've plucked out my head, I have no idea what the average play is per week/month per player.
- Formula is based on 10 game minimum for weekly and 30 game minimum for monthly with no cap. I don't think players should be punished for playing more games as that is exactly what the site wants.
- There are probably better ways to do the formula but I'm not clever enough to work it out It's also been a long time since I wrote a formula down so I apologise in advance if it's wrong.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
If you don't want to look at it the formula, it's basically :-
(1st place rate over x games * y) + (2nd place rate over x games * z) + (x game / a)
x = games played over week/month
y and z = multipliers for 1st/2nd place finishes to allow you to weight base points given
a = value to divide games by to create additional points based on games played
The formula is then purely based on your cash rate over your total games played and not just pure points for wins. If two players cash rate is identical then games played comes into it but how much emphasis you put on it is up to you. I tried lots of different combinations of y/z/a to get something that give someone that played less games but did well an equal chance of being high in the leaderboard as someone playing lots of games with a lower win rate. Turns out it's pretty hard
Feel free to pick holes in it, I just wanted to prove you could potentially do it with some real-ish examples Strangest bit about all this is that I hardly play SnGs on the site myself!
*Notes*
- Games played are based purely on random numbers I've plucked out my head, I have no idea what the average play is per week/month per player.
- Formula is based on 10 game minimum for weekly and 30 game minimum for monthly with no cap. I don't think players should be punished for playing more games as that is exactly what the site wants.
- There are probably better ways to do the formula but I'm not clever enough to work it out It's also been a long time since I wrote a formula down so I apologise in advance if it's wrong.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
If you don't want to look at it the formula, it's basically :-
(1st place rate over x games * y) + (2nd place rate over x games * z) + (x game / a)
x = games played over week/month
y and z = multipliers for 1st/2nd place finishes to allow you to weight base points given
a = value to divide games by to create additional points based on games played
The formula is then purely based on your cash rate over your total games played and not just pure points for wins. If two players cash rate is identical then games played comes into it but how much emphasis you put on it is up to you. I tried lots of different combinations of y/z/a to get something that give someone that played less games but did well an equal chance of being high in the leaderboard as someone playing lots of games with a lower win rate. Turns out it's pretty hard
Feel free to pick holes in it, I just wanted to prove you could potentially do it with some real-ish examples Strangest bit about all this is that I hardly play SnGs on the site myself!
More SnG promo ideas
- Knockout Week
Make all SnGs Knockout format basically. Small bounty on each players head, either progressive or standard. I imagine it would annoy the pure SnG fans but bounty stuff in general seems to be popular. Could add challenges for x knockouts achieved, knockout two players in a game etc.
- Winner takes all Week
Self Explanatory.
- Fast play week
Time bank is decreased.
- Turbo/Hyper/Deep/Ante week
Structure changes to suit.
All of the above could be part of SnG month with a new style every week.
- Shark Cage
I'm stealling this from PS but nobody appears to have implimented the format online yet as far as I'm aware. Development time probably rules this out and the rules can be a little tricky to explain but it would be a nice twist on normal SnGs
- Best of 3 series
Players play 3 SnG against each other instead of 1. Points are awarded for finishes in each game (5 for 1st, 4 for 2nd etc) and then after the three games payouts are awarded on points scored. You could pay three instead of two if each SnG is paid for seperately (i.e. it would be 3 Euro for the lowest best of 3) or offer additional bonus points for other criteria (Royals, Knocking every other player out in a game etc) to make the emphasis less on good play and a bit more random. You could also offer a rakeback if someone scores no/lowest amount of points over x games. This could also work for the headsup games as a winner takes scenario. Based on how many games people woud want to play against each other it could be raised to 5 if the structure leant towards turbo/hyper and still be done in an hour or so.
- Knockout Week
Make all SnGs Knockout format basically. Small bounty on each players head, either progressive or standard. I imagine it would annoy the pure SnG fans but bounty stuff in general seems to be popular. Could add challenges for x knockouts achieved, knockout two players in a game etc.
- Winner takes all Week
Self Explanatory.
- Fast play week
Time bank is decreased.
- Turbo/Hyper/Deep/Ante week
Structure changes to suit.
All of the above could be part of SnG month with a new style every week.
- Shark Cage
I'm stealling this from PS but nobody appears to have implimented the format online yet as far as I'm aware. Development time probably rules this out and the rules can be a little tricky to explain but it would be a nice twist on normal SnGs
- Best of 3 series
Players play 3 SnG against each other instead of 1. Points are awarded for finishes in each game (5 for 1st, 4 for 2nd etc) and then after the three games payouts are awarded on points scored. You could pay three instead of two if each SnG is paid for seperately (i.e. it would be 3 Euro for the lowest best of 3) or offer additional bonus points for other criteria (Royals, Knocking every other player out in a game etc) to make the emphasis less on good play and a bit more random. You could also offer a rakeback if someone scores no/lowest amount of points over x games. This could also work for the headsup games as a winner takes scenario. Based on how many games people woud want to play against each other it could be raised to 5 if the structure leant towards turbo/hyper and still be done in an hour or so.
- Tooltips?
I think this is what they are called. Those little boxes of text that appear when you hover over a button explainging what the button does. They don't appear to exist on the software. The icons are fairly self explanatory but they may be handy for new players. They would also be great for when players have achievement icons on their avator so you know what they were for.
I think this is what they are called. Those little boxes of text that appear when you hover over a button explainging what the button does. They don't appear to exist on the software. The icons are fairly self explanatory but they may be handy for new players. They would also be great for when players have achievement icons on their avator so you know what they were for.
- Chat
I don't mean a full chat box but a few basic predefined options you can direct at a player. Simple stuff, like 'Good Luck', 'Nice Hand/Bluff', 'Good Game' etc. that you could click on a player and send to them. Being anonymous is fun and all but it also means you can't be friendly. I've seen it in games like Hearthstone and it works quick well there.
I don't mean a full chat box but a few basic predefined options you can direct at a player. Simple stuff, like 'Good Luck', 'Nice Hand/Bluff', 'Good Game' etc. that you could click on a player and send to them. Being anonymous is fun and all but it also means you can't be friendly. I've seen it in games like Hearthstone and it works quick well there.
Pretty much the earliest we can get the full bonus shop would be Jan '17 and that's already cutting it close.
I'm on 25 unread PMs at the moment. I'm not going to get to them until I'm up to date on this thread.
Good point, if I'd been in all week I'd have done a competition but let's wait until Monday now.
The idea about " a way " to give more rakeback to losing players makes sense for the poker ecosystem.
What is the difference(besides judicial problems) between this" keeping them alive longer " by giving them back more, from putting an algorithm in there making sure nobody wins too much, so winners also have to play longer to get whatever kind of money they are looking for.
This way you keep everybody playing longer and unibet can rake more while climbing up in the pokerratrace between pokersites.
What is the difference(besides judicial problems) between this" keeping them alive longer " by giving them back more, from putting an algorithm in there making sure nobody wins too much, so winners also have to play longer to get whatever kind of money they are looking for.
This way you keep everybody playing longer and unibet can rake more while climbing up in the pokerratrace between pokersites.
I sent it to the email address registered to your account.
I have one dt-ticket and one super-dt-ticket that expire in 3 days so I don't get a chance to use them anymore. Could you give them 2 more weeks expiration time? (I'm asking for 2 weeks instead of 1 week because I ALSO have one super-dt-ticket and one dt-ticket that expire in 10 days and I would like to use those in the next week's tournaments.)
i am reading about sng promotions to much "reward best players " "reward grinders" , but lets think about last month promotions : omaha outlow - only best grinders were rewarded in those leaderboards , mtt ko leaderboard : only the mtt grinders were rewarded in this promo.
The only easy step to play a freeroll was on sng scrap.
so...
what is the difference between thos sng grinders and those cash games grinders? i think in cash games you may loose your bankroll faster than in any sng games.if in sng you may have a ton of luck and be in the money , on cash games you may loose all the money in one hand
The only easy step to play a freeroll was on sng scrap.
so...
what is the difference between thos sng grinders and those cash games grinders? i think in cash games you may loose your bankroll faster than in any sng games.if in sng you may have a ton of luck and be in the money , on cash games you may loose all the money in one hand
Hey,
I'm only one who gets this when trying to log in ?
EDIT: It's something related to my country, will be fixed. nvm
I'm only one who gets this when trying to log in ?
EDIT: It's something related to my country, will be fixed. nvm
hi Andrew.
I think you missed my post:
I think you missed my post:
Andrew I wasn't referring to a rush in implementing the bonus shop. I was talking about altering feasible rake back levels.
It's the same for me. Are there any ways to fix this ? I cannot log in even if I click "yes" (it's the same for the client or the website).
last time I had that message, it did log in after clicked "No" :S
with this quote "Are you saying that we should rig the site? The reason we don't do that is that a) it's illegal, b) it's immoral, c) it doesn't make us any money because we'd risk getting shut down, and d) it isn't poker any more. We're a poker site." are you saying that Unibet is not using an algorithm to have an equilibrum between advanced players and begginers? how are you explaining the millions situations where low cards are tripled in a way where even the einstein would be ashamed?
What i have seen today i never believed that i will ever see in a poker room ever in my life.I do have my doubts regarding your fairness in this poker room.
What i have seen today i never believed that i will ever see in a poker room ever in my life.I do have my doubts regarding your fairness in this poker room.
i am reading about sng promotions to much "reward best players " "reward grinders" , but lets think about last month promotions : omaha outlow - only best grinders were rewarded in those leaderboards , mtt ko leaderboard : only the mtt grinders were rewarded in this promo.
The only easy step to play a freeroll was on sng scrap.
so...
what is the difference between thos sng grinders and those cash games grinders? i think in cash games you may loose your bankroll faster than in any sng games.if in sng you may have a ton of luck and be in the money , on cash games you may loose all the money in one hand
The only easy step to play a freeroll was on sng scrap.
so...
what is the difference between thos sng grinders and those cash games grinders? i think in cash games you may loose your bankroll faster than in any sng games.if in sng you may have a ton of luck and be in the money , on cash games you may loose all the money in one hand
Maybe it's worth doing for Q4 though. We'll discuss it internally.
Aha, sorry. Done.
I played 10€ UO tourney, had pretty wealthy stack and only 1 played left to receive 50€ ticket. I hope I wasn't blinded out
Why not make a SNG-promo like the milestone-promo.
A base prize per stake with multipliers for winrate and games played.
Or a player predefines his winrate and games played, if he does, he gets the prize. If not, he gets no prize.
A base prize per stake with multipliers for winrate and games played.
Or a player predefines his winrate and games played, if he does, he gets the prize. If not, he gets no prize.
I'm not familiar with it beyond the fact it exists.
Of course if its on a network then the benefits would mainly flow to the other skins on the network, depending on how the network runs its rake sharing model (one network supposedly tracks money round the system and remembers who originally deposited it).
I am one of the people who have a modified deck. If you remember I have been one of the old people droning on about the default cards being hard to read and this has helped me see the cards better. It would be ideal if the software offered a choice of deck as some other sites do, but in the meantime this is a good correction of what many perceive as a "fault" with the poker room.
I think if you allow people to swap the graphics file then it will be made available free to everyone - I think its only going PM at the moment because there isn't clarity over which way you want to go on it - but I didn't know or pay the person who let me have it. If he doesn't want to make it available then someone else would create one that was available to everyone so hopefully that aspect shouldn't be an issue.
Also, in my opinion as a (former) programmer, a graphics file isn't part of "software" so I think you can do this without compromising your no 3rd party software policy.
Foiled again. Of course you've been on 2p2 long enough to know that the phrase "good for the poker economy" means "good for me personally".
Of course if its on a network then the benefits would mainly flow to the other skins on the network, depending on how the network runs its rake sharing model (one network supposedly tracks money round the system and remembers who originally deposited it).
I think if you allow people to swap the graphics file then it will be made available free to everyone - I think its only going PM at the moment because there isn't clarity over which way you want to go on it - but I didn't know or pay the person who let me have it. If he doesn't want to make it available then someone else would create one that was available to everyone so hopefully that aspect shouldn't be an issue.
Also, in my opinion as a (former) programmer, a graphics file isn't part of "software" so I think you can do this without compromising your no 3rd party software policy.
Foiled again. Of course you've been on 2p2 long enough to know that the phrase "good for the poker economy" means "good for me personally".
Thanks for the replies again Andrew.
When you tile 4 tables for example they tile into a square but the square is aligned to the left of the screen not the centre. Please enjoy the following crude paint image to explain what I mean
Window on the left is how it works now, window on the right is how it would be in an ideal world
When you tile 4 tables for example they tile into a square but the square is aligned to the left of the screen not the centre. Please enjoy the following crude paint image to explain what I mean
Window on the left is how it works now, window on the right is how it would be in an ideal world
The ipoker jackpot sngs have a extra entry fee, much like normal jackpot cash tables. They had a $2 that cost $2.40, a $5 that was i think $6 to enter. The extra rake was used to provide a pool for the first person to win 5 consecutive ones. They also had/have higher buy in ones but i dont know if you would have the liquidity for these.
It is not always the better players who win these, and with your site allowing screen name changes it would provide a carrot for the normal guy to aim for i think.
It is not always the better players who win these, and with your site allowing screen name changes it would provide a carrot for the normal guy to aim for i think.
The ipoker jackpot sngs have a extra entry fee, much like normal jackpot cash tables. They had a $2 that cost $2.40, a $5 that was i think $6 to enter. The extra rake was used to provide a pool for the first person to win 5 consecutive ones. They also had/have higher buy in ones but i dont know if you would have the liquidity for these.
It is not always the better players who win these, and with your site allowing screen name changes it would provide a carrot for the normal guy to aim for i think.
It is not always the better players who win these, and with your site allowing screen name changes it would provide a carrot for the normal guy to aim for i think.
if it will be as it is on 888 poker will be chaos. they have so many types of sng and they simply dont run as it should be. thx god someone on unibet was thinking on this aspect and has build only 2 types of sng
Hey, just seen this. Yes, we definitely do have mutual friends. You're daishi.exe right? I vaguely remember seeing you online and playing a few games with you near the tail end of your SC lifespan and near the beginning of mine. I spoke with Eerik, pr0n.ee, Def-The-Feared a lot around that point, all of whom I'm sure you know
Nice to see a website give fair notice before altering the VIP program.
Q4 seems fair to me.
As for a SNG promo I really think it would be cool if it wasn't judged on really any skill or mass volume.
How about it broken down to a 20 block period and points are given out for hitting good hands.
Flopping trips is worth x points
Hitting a str8 flush worth x points
KOing 2 people in the same hand worth x points
Comeback from half the starting chips.
And other cool hands/accomplishments as well.
This would allow anyone a fair chance to win while giving grinders a bigger chance based on percentage of tries.
Q4 seems fair to me.
As for a SNG promo I really think it would be cool if it wasn't judged on really any skill or mass volume.
How about it broken down to a 20 block period and points are given out for hitting good hands.
Flopping trips is worth x points
Hitting a str8 flush worth x points
KOing 2 people in the same hand worth x points
Comeback from half the starting chips.
And other cool hands/accomplishments as well.
This would allow anyone a fair chance to win while giving grinders a bigger chance based on percentage of tries.
Same here. I can't login to unibet site too. I also think that it's because of government restricting gambling, but would like to get approval from unibet. I hope everything will be fine later. Alias Mindaugas00.
I played 10€ UO tourney, had pretty wealthy stack and only 1 played left to receive 50€ ticket. I hope I wasn't blinded out
I played 10€ UO tourney, had pretty wealthy stack and only 1 played left to receive 50€ ticket. I hope I wasn't blinded out
I'm not familiar with it beyond the fact it exists.
Of course if its on a network then the benefits would mainly flow to the other skins on the network, depending on how the network runs its rake sharing model (one network supposedly tracks money round the system and remembers who originally deposited it).
Of course if its on a network then the benefits would mainly flow to the other skins on the network, depending on how the network runs its rake sharing model (one network supposedly tracks money round the system and remembers who originally deposited it).
iPoker and MPN both have systems to allocate rake to sites on the network based on whether players win or lose, as well as how much they rake. I don't know how effective they are, but it looked pretty decent when I was at Ladbrokes.
Thanks for the replies again Andrew.
When you tile 4 tables for example they tile into a square but the square is aligned to the left of the screen not the centre. Please enjoy the following crude paint image to explain what I mean
Window on the left is how it works now, window on the right is how it would be in an ideal world
When you tile 4 tables for example they tile into a square but the square is aligned to the left of the screen not the centre. Please enjoy the following crude paint image to explain what I mean
Window on the left is how it works now, window on the right is how it would be in an ideal world
The ipoker jackpot sngs have a extra entry fee, much like normal jackpot cash tables. They had a $2 that cost $2.40, a $5 that was i think $6 to enter. The extra rake was used to provide a pool for the first person to win 5 consecutive ones. They also had/have higher buy in ones but i dont know if you would have the liquidity for these.
Hey, just seen this. Yes, we definitely do have mutual friends. You're daishi.exe right? I vaguely remember seeing you online and playing a few games with you near the tail end of your SC lifespan and near the beginning of mine. I spoke with Eerik, pr0n.ee, Def-The-Feared a lot around that point, all of whom I'm sure you know
As for a SNG promo I really think it would be cool if it wasn't judged on really any skill or mass volume.
How about it broken down to a 20 block period and points are given out for hitting good hands.
Flopping trips is worth x points
Hitting a str8 flush worth x points
KOing 2 people in the same hand worth x points
Comeback from half the starting chips.
And other cool hands/accomplishments as well.
This would allow anyone a fair chance to win while giving grinders a bigger chance based on percentage of tries.
How about it broken down to a 20 block period and points are given out for hitting good hands.
Flopping trips is worth x points
Hitting a str8 flush worth x points
KOing 2 people in the same hand worth x points
Comeback from half the starting chips.
And other cool hands/accomplishments as well.
This would allow anyone a fair chance to win while giving grinders a bigger chance based on percentage of tries.
On SNG promos - I think the trouble with one that rewards ROI over the month is that if someone runs really well for the first 100 tournaments or whatever the minimum is, they are actually disincentivised to keep playing.
Also one that lets you restart and have goes at more blocks of 100 or 50 or whatever would send value to people who were going to play those tournaments anyway.
Probably best to just do it over the first 100 - and do it on a points basis, so someone who has played 40 so far is encouraged to another 10 and move up the leaderboard. Not sure how it should work with different stake levels though - maybe there should be separate leaderboards - if so then 100 per leaderboard is too many.
Also one that lets you restart and have goes at more blocks of 100 or 50 or whatever would send value to people who were going to play those tournaments anyway.
Probably best to just do it over the first 100 - and do it on a points basis, so someone who has played 40 so far is encouraged to another 10 and move up the leaderboard. Not sure how it should work with different stake levels though - maybe there should be separate leaderboards - if so then 100 per leaderboard is too many.
Yeh. God, I hate those old names (.exe was the clan though). I talk to Eerik a lot as I lived in Estonia for a year when I played cards last, and in fact I was there two weeks ago on holiday. Maybe this was too far before your time, but coincidentally I had dinner with [9]Everlast a couple of days ago
You're doing a good job with Unibet and the support in this thread etc btw, so thanks for that. I'm one of those guys who quit Stars due to rakeback changes and ever tougher games squeezing me into smaller and smaller winrates. Although I miss the software and how convenient it was to just sit down at 8 zoom tables with 0 waiting time, I don't miss much else about it. Certainly not since the Amaya takeover anyway.
I didn't even make a deposit at Unibet, just started with the free 14.5 euro NL4 ticket and am now easily rolled for NL200 lol. Not quite like the old days, but def like the direction with keeping the recs happy and aiming more bonuses towards them
I tried to login which was unsuccesful so I contacted support and this is what I've been told "We are expirence a general technical issue with accounts from Lithuania." Im not sure what is the situation with my poker tickets but hopefully this will be fixed until they expire
Hey Andrew I just got the email. I was wondering if I could get one with all my cash game results cause the email only has mtt and sng results
Alias = Cleanoutkid
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Alias = Cleanoutkid
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
why you dont send e-mail to support and you get that in the same day?
I didn't know I can do that, ima get on that just now tho
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Ignore my previous posts, my phone never showed me the Cash game report spreadsheet for some reason but I opened it up on my computer and I see it now
Sorry about that
Sorry about that
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE