Carla_Bruni

Hi Andrew,

I'm just wondering if there's anyway to get an export of results that would allow me to import into HEM, I know the site doesn't allow trackers so we can't import in realtime, but i'd like to get some graphs of how i'm doing and finish positions etc in sngs. I can review the history but it's a table of past results but it doesn't seem to show finish positions only amount debited or credited, and the report is in pounds not euros.

Basically any data that would allow me to import my results into HEM, if not do you think there will be a facility to do this at a later date,

Thanks

Ok weird, I shut down Kaspersky Security, and rebooted Unibet, logged in again, and now it seems to work. Rebooted Kaspersky, logged off from Unibet, logged in again with Kaspersky running as well and now I can log back in...

So unless you have adjusted some settings or whatever in the meantime, it must have been Kaspersky messing with the unibet client communications or something like that...

Hi,
First of all I want to thank you for making poker more fun!

Now could you change all of my tickets to one 50€ Unibet open ticket?

My alias is Karampa

In the challenges, is there a difference in

a) "See a flop that only contains..."
b) "Reach a flop of..."?

Does a) mean I don't have to be involved in the hand, just sit at the table?

I am fairly certain that both phrases require you to still be involved in the hand until the flop is dealt.

credit this one to me to please
hand54728289

so its been about six months since i started asking about the mtt schedule and it is still a joke.adding some 25€ or 50€ gtds doesnt change anything.......

why are you not trying ANY of the tournaments i suggested?

where are the full ring NL tournaments?

where are the rebuy (not multientry) tourneys?

why did u remove the 10€ 1k at 21.00?one of the few tournaments i actually played.

it seems to me you are WAY more interested in cash game players than tournament players, because this is going way to slow !


and yes:i now august is usually slow, but from september i am really exspecting HUGE improvements in the NL tournament section - i starting asking about it in february or early march !!

BESIDES that you are doing a great job for the majority of people who write in this topic-so keep up the good work and DONT keep on dissapointing all us players who are looking for TOURNAMENTS .............

I don't have a copy of HEM on this machine so I'm not sure what it allows for manual imports. If you PM me your login name or alias, I am fine sending you e.g. number of hands, amount raked. I can also get your finishes in SNG or MTT. It won't be in a format that HEM can automatically import though.

Weird. Glad to hear it works now though.

Sure, done.

Yeh, it's the same. Hopefully next quarter we'll be a bit more consistent with the wording.

Could you PM me your login name or post your alias please?

I added a daily deepstack tournament basically because you kept asking. So it's unfair to say that we aren't adding anything you wanted.

But more generally, I know you'd like us to add the tournaments you specifically wanted, but I'm afraid we can't operate that way. We need to look at the bigger picture. Adding one tournament at one time has a knock-on affect to the other tournaments nearby.

The aim is to change all Unibet Open to 9 max when we start London satellites. At that point, assuming nothing else changes, 301 weekly tournaments will be 9 max. 175 will be 6 max.

This is a feature that we'd like to add, but we have other priorities right now. The 1.6 release essentially set us back by two months. The release at the end of this month will be basically 1.6, except it doesn't make everything break. I'd love to get rebuys in soon, but we have to take business decisions on everything. On a related note, I believe that a few lobby improvements are coming in with the next version, as discussed earlier in the thread.

We've changed lots of tournaments based on how many people played. If they didn't do very well, we took them away. I'm sorry that changed one of the ones you liked, but that's the way it's going to go sometimes.

Yes. We are. We make a lot more money from cash games than we do tournaments. If we can put in 10 hours to get a 1% improvement in cash, we'll make a lot more than if we put in 10 hours to make a 1% improvement in tournaments. That's the nature of the beast I'm afraid.

That said:



That's the share of rake that we get from MTT. We declined for a couple of months, but now we're doing much better. The peak share is lower because we have fewer entries on Saturdays, but we are overlaying a LOT less. Right now we have a larger MTT share than we've ever had, and we're overlaying less than we ever have.

I know you don't like what we're doing, and I'm sorry for that, but what we are doing is working well. We have more improvements in mind and we'll look at guarantees as the season picks up again (there are signs that this is happening already).

Hi andrew, Re exception for ubo tickets, "Good point. OK, exception for players who already have a package." 355. Sorry no idea how to use single quote. Don't want to copy whole page. You have exchanged previously on this basis. pirahn.

Aha, cool, thanks. Done.

We're testing ante tournaments. The blinds don't rise, but the antes do. The tourney lobby doesn't really support them properly (it gets confused by the levels), but the tourney itself works... we think.

So time to test. There's a €50 guaranteed, €1 buy-in, ante tournament tonight at 20:00 CET. The name is "SupBro?" and the password is "anteup".

Thanks I'll send my details over for some results export in about a week or so if that's ok, appreciated.

Just a flag about tournaments. The blinds don't show until the tournament has started in many tournaments. So for instance in the Deepstack guarantee I can see the starting stack is 7k but when i click blind structure it's completely empty like below.

I've noticed this before, like this, not sure if you were aware?

my opinion after playing "SupBro?" with ante leveling up only :
it was fun and different, but levels should be much shorter with stacks of 2K.... maybe 2 mins

Wasn't as much fun when people chase flushdraws and suck out.

well, thats poker i guess...

btw, 1 minor suggestion for tourney:
when players divide the pot, and total pot is odd number, perhaps it would be better that 1 player gets 1 more chip than the other, because it wouldn't matter so much;
now the way it is, when players divide odd number, everyone gets equal amounts, and then they have different stacks than everyone else (for example 1370.50 ). Decimals just stand out, and it's not possible otherwise to get such amounts by betting

Dear Andrew,
Could you please exchange 10 of my 1e SNG/MTT tickest to 1x10e SNG ticket?
Alias is Shadow50.

Many thanks

I disagree ! Its hard to find decent structures at lower buyin was nice to see some decent structure with this one.

Andrew, Query please. If i have a cash ticket say 100 and leave table with only 20. What happens when i want to rejoin a table as i have less than the minimum to join. Why is it that on a cash ticket you can only play 1 table. Would you not rake more if you played more tables.

You get credited the cash if the ticket gets below min buy in.

Thanks, I knew it happened and assumed it had already been reported but it turns out it may not have been. I've reported it now as I agree it's not a good look.

When we add them to the full schedule we'll have some level time variety.

Sure, done.

Yup. That's one of the potential problems with multi-table tickets - you'd have to require players buy in for 100bb minimum.

Thanks, done. Sorry about that. This should be fixed with the next release.

Anyone got any suggestions for individual Challenges? I'm planning for Q3 now (Oct/Nov/Dec). My current plan is to reduce major Challenges to about 2,500 hands and keep minor at 500, adjusting points accordingly.

I think minor challenges where there is only 1 thing to accomplish are a bit tedious (reach flop 3 of a kind, and such)

also, I would be ok if majors were 5000 on average. How much are they now, 10000 ?

Majors were 10k in Q2 and are 8.4k in Q3.

The idea behind Challenges that can be completed in one hand was that they would trigger for some people who normally wouldn't care about loyalty schemes, and it'd make them go and have a look. But it appears that more people like Challenges than I was expecting, so they're less important.

The problem is that it's hard to have variety if you rule out all single-hand Challenges. I am very eager to avoid the kind of tedium that you'd get from "be dealt two hearts", "be dealt two diamonds", "be dealt two clubs", etc.

well then, maybe 2500 would be too small for a "major" challenge, if minor is only 5 times less. 5000 seems just about right then, IMO;

I think that 1 hand challenges are less interesting because they cannot be tracked, it just happens once when you are lucky enough and thats it; now I don't know all challenges, but I usually was ok more or less with everything until I got this 3 of a kind flop thing.

So if you are counting average hands required for challenge, maybe some challenges should be more about what hands you are dealt and less about what board you see when you enter a hand...