![[Unibet] Official Thread](https://d30akgybcov179.cloudfront.net/icons/hamburger.svg){kind=icon}
![[Unibet] Official Thread](https://d30akgybcov179.cloudfront.net/icons/close-sidebar.svg){kind=icon}
[Unibet] Official Thread
![[Unibet] Official Thread](https://d30akgybcov179.cloudfront.net/icons/quote.svg){kind=icon}
06-18-2015
, 07:09 PM
Quote:
I think you might have played the wrong one, I was a bit confused with the times for these tourneys. I am sure there was an hour difference between what the client said and the actual start time in the UK. Pretty sure there was an hour difference.
The 17.45 and 18.45 both have the same name.
Just double checked the 30e guarantee omaha one, 18.15 UTC but in the client for me it shows BST so it says 19.15.
The 17.45 and 18.45 both have the same name.
Just double checked the 30e guarantee omaha one, 18.15 UTC but in the client for me it shows BST so it says 19.15.
Andrew,
would it be possible then to somehow make it like I played at the right time, please ?
I'm really not a tourney player and I played this specifically just for the mission..... I saw the name and guessed that it should be it
06-18-2015
, 11:19 PM
06-19-2015
, 03:59 AM
Quote:
https://www.unibet.co.uk/on-your-mobile/poker-app
The android app is only for tablet at the the moment, Andrew has mentioned before that the phone one is being worked on but it is a big job because of all the different screen sizes on different phones.
The android app is only for tablet at the the moment, Andrew has mentioned before that the phone one is being worked on but it is a big job because of all the different screen sizes on different phones.
@kimosabi yes, well when they are done with the hand replayer, I guess that sharing on social networks will be included too
06-19-2015
, 05:36 AM
I click on thet link on my android phone and says "The page is not available for my device"
06-19-2015
, 05:44 AM
but you CAN play it on Android phone
06-19-2015
, 06:01 AM
Quote:
firstly, I prefer using English interface, so I will just tell you the things I saw from some screenshot I found on the internet as there might be more words to be changed...
Here's the screen where I saw these weirdly translated words:
here is the list of things to be changed (only from this screenshot) which are translated really poorly (others make sense or are at least understandable):
1. 1 stalasai -> 1 stalas. "stalas" is singular, while "stalai" is plural, there is no such word as "stalasai", it was a typo.
2. Atviras stalas -> Atidaryti stalą. In this case, word open was used as an adjective instead of verb.
3. Vardas -> Pavadinimas. It has the same meaning, but used for non-living things.
4. Pradžios kiekis -> Pradinis žetonų kiekis. It looks like it was a literal translation, the corrected version says "Amount of starting chips".
5. Žaidėjai -> Žaidėjų skaičius. This would be clearer if it referred to the number of players instead of just players.
6. Apmokėta vietaos -> Apdovanojamos vietos. Firstly there was a typo there, secondly my version, which means "Awarded places" makes more sense in Lithuanian, I believe.
For now, that is all, but I am pretty sure there are more things to check than this tournament menu
btw, I think you got lost with the number of tickets... I still miss 5x10UO tickets.
It was 2x50 to 10x10 UO and 10MTT to 10x1sng, I received 15 tickets, 10 sng tickets, but only got 5x10 UO tickets
Here's the screen where I saw these weirdly translated words:
here is the list of things to be changed (only from this screenshot) which are translated really poorly (others make sense or are at least understandable):
1. 1 stalasai -> 1 stalas. "stalas" is singular, while "stalai" is plural, there is no such word as "stalasai", it was a typo.
2. Atviras stalas -> Atidaryti stalą. In this case, word open was used as an adjective instead of verb.
3. Vardas -> Pavadinimas. It has the same meaning, but used for non-living things.
4. Pradžios kiekis -> Pradinis žetonų kiekis. It looks like it was a literal translation, the corrected version says "Amount of starting chips".
5. Žaidėjai -> Žaidėjų skaičius. This would be clearer if it referred to the number of players instead of just players.
6. Apmokėta vietaos -> Apdovanojamos vietos. Firstly there was a typo there, secondly my version, which means "Awarded places" makes more sense in Lithuanian, I believe.
For now, that is all, but I am pretty sure there are more things to check than this tournament menu
btw, I think you got lost with the number of tickets... I still miss 5x10UO tickets.
It was 2x50 to 10x10 UO and 10MTT to 10x1sng, I received 15 tickets, 10 sng tickets, but only got 5x10 UO tickets
So basically it sounds like a lot of the translation is very bad. I'll tell the developers (they're the ones who contract out for the translations).
Quote:
This was really nice to see too. You guys look like you had a great time and it's really nice to know you are getting the industry recognition you deserve for your innovation in poker. Pretty cool the industry is even this organised and cares to be honest, kind of inspiring for poker fans that the online poker/gaming industry is getting something right with the awards.
Quote:
Would be nice if we could filter the poker activity by payouts or such as now its just a long list of everything, after looking a while I guess these are the bootcamp payouts:
08/06/2015 - Premium - Deposit - £7.32 (€10)
17/06/2015 - Premium - Deposit - £7.18 (€10)
So first weeks bootcamp been paid the Monday after and last weeks bootcamp been paid yesterday (Wednesday). Would absolutely be better to get a notification or even a mail as the way its now its not rlly transparant enough imo.
Sure we get paid and I would never expect not to as I trust Unibet for this (unless something bugged up
) but playing detective to find what and when I got paid is a bit too much work for the rec player imo.
08/06/2015 - Premium - Deposit - £7.32 (€10)
17/06/2015 - Premium - Deposit - £7.18 (€10)
So first weeks bootcamp been paid the Monday after and last weeks bootcamp been paid yesterday (Wednesday). Would absolutely be better to get a notification or even a mail as the way its now its not rlly transparant enough imo.
Sure we get paid and I would never expect not to as I trust Unibet for this (unless something bugged up
) but playing detective to find what and when I got paid is a bit too much work for the rec player imo.
PLO has grown faster than NLHE, which is quite surprising if we thought liquidity was the sole limiting factor. I think it's mostly because we include PLO in promotions while most sites don't bother.
I'm interested in the idea of trying to get a larger market share in PLO than we do in NLHE. If we can do that then it's definitely something to try in other games too. I think O8 would be an easier game to add and probably better for the longterm than 9-max NLHE etc.
The tourney lobbies are my least favourite part of the site right now. We're redesigning them at the moment but this won't come in until after the summer. When we do this we'll redesign the tourney schedule, so I'm interested in any feedback anyone has on that.
I'm not much interested in having a big Sunday tournament because I think that people will join and only play that. They'll be good and when they win they'll take the money out - that's not good for our ecology. We're talking about having a Sunday "major" that you can only enter via satellite though.
Quote:
Hi Andrew,
Not sure if this has been suggested before, so apologies if I it has - I think it's a bit silly to request identity verification prior to any sort of depositing. I tried to make an account just to browse the lobby, check traffic etc, so no intention of depositing just yet. However, I was not able to log in and the support stuff instructed me to send verification documents (ID, utility bill etc). That is a big stretch, imho. Since those would make sense if the owner of the newly created account would try to make a deposit (by any method), but what's the point if no deposit attempt has been made?
So why not allow the creation of new accounts without verification and only request security papers when trying to make a deposit?
Not sure if this has been suggested before, so apologies if I it has - I think it's a bit silly to request identity verification prior to any sort of depositing. I tried to make an account just to browse the lobby, check traffic etc, so no intention of depositing just yet. However, I was not able to log in and the support stuff instructed me to send verification documents (ID, utility bill etc). That is a big stretch, imho. Since those would make sense if the owner of the newly created account would try to make a deposit (by any method), but what's the point if no deposit attempt has been made?
So why not allow the creation of new accounts without verification and only request security papers when trying to make a deposit?
Quote:
Hello Andrew,
today I played "€250 GTD Hold'em 9 Seat MTT" at 18:45 CET, in order to clear Part 4, step 2 of my June mission.
I finished in 30th place (i think), but I still do not see checkmark in mission counter that this step is completed.
Please check that ?
my nickname was finamala
today I played "€250 GTD Hold'em 9 Seat MTT" at 18:45 CET, in order to clear Part 4, step 2 of my June mission.
I finished in 30th place (i think), but I still do not see checkmark in mission counter that this step is completed.
Please check that ?
my nickname was finamala
Quote:
I think you might have played the wrong one, I was a bit confused with the times for these tourneys. I am sure there was an hour difference between what the client said and the actual start time in the UK. Pretty sure there was an hour difference.
The 17.45 and 18.45 both have the same name.
Just double checked the 30e guarantee omaha one, 18.15 UTC but in the client for me it shows BST so it says 19.15.
The 17.45 and 18.45 both have the same name.
Just double checked the 30e guarantee omaha one, 18.15 UTC but in the client for me it shows BST so it says 19.15.
Quote:
lol, really it seems that there are 2 same tourneys just 1 hour apart from each other......... damn, that sure is confusing with all the different time zones and everything.
Andrew,
would it be possible then to somehow make it like I played at the right time, please ?
I'm really not a tourney player and I played this specifically just for the mission..... I saw the name and guessed that it should be it
Andrew,
would it be possible then to somehow make it like I played at the right time, please ?
I'm really not a tourney player and I played this specifically just for the mission..... I saw the name and guessed that it should be it
We're looking at improving that at the moment.
Kapetain, I set that mission step as complete on your account.
Yeh, sorry - the Windows phone market is just too small right now, and most of the places that it's got good market share aren't very wealthy or don't allow poker.
Last edited by Bobo Fett; 06-20-2015 at 12:14 AM.
Reason: Poster requested.
06-19-2015
, 07:08 AM
06-19-2015
, 07:29 AM
Just kidding. Won't be traveling much for work until end of July, so I better clear the flop requirements. As for Stud, as much as I love the game but there is only one site where I can log in and almost always find a table of it running. This speaks a lot for how popular it is anymore.
06-19-2015
, 07:30 AM
Andrew, when you say 'export hands' does this mean you are considering having hand histories?
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
06-19-2015
, 08:04 AM
Quote:
Andrew, when you say 'export hands' does this mean you are considering having hand histories?
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
I love Unibet ( even if i do moan a little bit occasionally ( sorry Andrew) ) and would hate to see it destroyed by a load of mass multitabling nits exploiting all the latest software tools with win rates determined by what software you can afford to purchase rather than poker ability. Unibet poker is work in progress but the increasing numbers playing there against a background drop in overall poker traffic show that Andrew and his team are doing things right.
06-19-2015
, 09:06 AM
Quote:
Andrew, when you say 'export hands' does this mean you are considering having hand histories?
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
If so I think exportable hand histories would be a bad idea for a few reasons.
1. Regs can use tools to see their own expected value, was great 10 years ago but now they quickly disappear from the tables once their red line starts to trend down. Keep em guessing
2. Bad players could start getting targeted more if they're name and hands played can be stored in a database and shared/studied. I doubt recs change their alias very often.
Boom player definitely seems the best option.
Quote:
I love Unibet ( even if i do moan a little bit occasionally ( sorry Andrew) ) and would hate to see it destroyed by a load of mass multitabling nits exploiting all the latest software tools with win rates determined by what software you can afford to purchase rather than poker ability. Unibet poker is work in progress but the increasing numbers playing there against a background drop in overall poker traffic show that Andrew and his team are doing things right.
06-19-2015
, 09:14 AM
