this worked for me. thanks a lot Andy!

Recreational players are very "lucky" here, which is why winning players don't stay here for long.

You are wrong! Unibet has a lot recreational players so it seems they are always lucky. Use your third eye and you will win big time on Unibet.

How do you know that winning players don't stay long by the way?

You yourself answered your own question. If the winning players stayed in unibet, there wouldn't be a lot of recreational players. Their number would be approximately on the level of other rooms with a similar rake.
And since unibet has relatively high rakeback and very low rake at low stakes, the number of regulars should be even higher than average.

Untracked euro sites are a haven. Leave if you want.

[Insert 2 pair vs flopped set all-in hand, played yesterday, here]

Seat 2: MACRO11: bet €629.48 and won €0, net result: €-629.48

Yes I have, thank you for your question.

No, I did not. You are trying to be a smart ass. It is a fact that there are more recreational players than hardcore grinders on every poker site. I would like to know how do you know that winning players leave Unibet quickly? You don't know that or you have to watch every table or work for Unibet. But I doubt that because I gather from your previous post that Unibet favors recreational players. What nonsense is!

"It is a fact that there are more recreational players than hardcore grinders on every poker site"

Maybe read every post on this page and try to understand why I posted that text before posting BS.

*Why do I even post on this S**T forum full with narcissistic stupid kids...!*

Another smart ass trying to be funny.

You win, I leave this forum and spent my time better!

Where can I convert a played hand from Unibet to a forum-formatted post? weaktight, 2+2, upswing converters all return an error when I copy-paste what I get from Unibet client and I can't find the reason.

It seems like you are a recreational player yourself, and you don't realize how competitive modern online poker is, even at micro stakes.
I know a lot of winning poker players who do not play unibet due to distrust of the room.
If you look at the top poker rooms without HUD, they all send hand statistics for analysis in trackers, which increases the level of trust in the room.
Unibet has had a pretty bad reputation in the poker community for years, but they don't do anything about it. And I suppose there is a reason for that.

The converter needs to support the hand history format before it'll convert correctly. You would need to contact the hand converter developers requesting they add support for our hand histories.

That is one way. The other is you create a HH which is common and not trying to be eccentric/deviant in this too

But seriously i also tried tons of option in the past to convert your HHs but failed every time.
Would be nice to have the opportunity to share/post HHs to discuss intresting spots.

unibet makes hard to everyone to improve their own game thats for sure. Thats why i share my volume and play sites where i can import hands and i can analyse my game.

My bad, you got the point. Ofc it is true in a way cos a few % of the pool is winning hence there are way more fish account than reg.

But when you join a pool/table the case is the other way around. Ofc one can find tables w fish but have to search for it and tons of tables running only filled w regs (except hs)

The quality of those regs is another topic. So i do not think i posted clear BS

I'm not an expert in HH formats but I'm pretty sure most sites have small deviations which require the developers of these replayers to make changes for the specific sites. The Unibet HHs as far as I can tell are pretty similar to a Stars HH and it's just the odd difference here and there that breaks the replayers. They were also created long before the option to copy them was so it would require much more dev from our side to change them everywhere in the client and back office than it would for a replayer dev to edit an existing parser slightly to match the format we use.

I spoke to Pokeit, the team behind the Upswing Replayer, the last time this was brought up and they said it was a low priority because there was low/no demand. If they have to choose between their devs fixing something in their paid HUD or adding support for barely used HHs in their free replayer I think it'll be an easy decision every time.

Having said that, I believe HRC added support for Unibet HHs pretty quickly after a request was made in their thread so it's really up to the devs of the software. A lot of them have threads on 2+2 or Discord servers so it's just a case of asking them to add support. If they need example HHs I'm more than happy to provide them.

To your last point, I completely agree and I did the same as a player. I hated not being able to analyse hands and always played on a site that offered HHs as well as Unibet. The Game Lab is a start in helping to eliminate this problem but I understand the stats are very limited and not for all formats. I'll continue to push for a delayed anonymous HH download option whenever it's brought up because, as I've mentioned before, in 2021 not giving players the option to access their data from review is more of a negative than a positive when comparing us to the competition IMO.

@Andy-Unibet:

thx the reply, i appreciate it!

tbh because it was quite a pain in the arse to get the HH for a specific hand (and couldn t convert it anyway) i gave up the hope to deal with it untill we can download all of em.
i play cg so i do not have HRC.

i hope your hustle about this topic gets through soon (i doubt it but it is not your fault).

since you brought up the gamelab here is my opinion/experience on it:

- seems mostly useless (except hands played, would be nice to see the rake payed)
- in school section on the 2nd tab it says alias used:0 and i change 3 aliases every day
- in the school tab there is a coloured bar under the statistics and i have a question about it: does the green area means that most of the players stats are in that range or it is considered as decent value inside that range??!
- at least looks cool/nice

overall i think it would have been way easier to get anonim HHs (if the big bosses had decided to go that way) than this fancy gamelab.
i know they hope this is what recs need/aprreciate (lets hope they r right otherwise really poorly spent money)

@Andy-Unibet

Fair enough, honest answer. I definitely understand Unibet's decision to keep the game light and rec-friendly and I believe that's the reasoning behind leaving out HH downloads. But I doubt exporting HH for conversion would affect the playerbase too much, if at all, so I hope I'll find a workaround for that soon.

After posting yesterday I reached out to CheckDecide and asked them about adding support for Unibet HHs. I've sent examples over so hopefully we'll see something at some point but no timeframes were given.

Regarding Game Lab: -

- You can get a report from CS that includes your rake paid for whatever period you like so long as the data is still in the back office.
- Alias stat not populating is on the bug list.
- Green would be a recommended value, not population average.

There are a lot of different people that need to be aligned when it comes to a decision regarding releasing anon HHs. Internally within Unibet the team needs to be happy with a solution and then everyone at Relax also needs to be happy that a solution is something they can develop and won't effect anything else (liquidity, gameplay, fraud etc). I'll keep fighting the good fight.

You have to remember the decision to not offer HH downloads was one made several years ago when HUDs were seen as the devil and studying was not at the forefront of player development. The release of the standalone Unibet client pre dates the release of the first version of PioSolver by nearly a year so at the time it made sense.

I'll see if there are any interim features we can implement to make studying a little easier. First one that comes to mind would be the ability to star or highlight hands in the replayer so that they can be searchable in the History tab so at least you can find the ones you want to review quickly post session. If anyone has any other ideas let me know and I can pitch them.

Nice!
LFG!
Really good idea!!!

And some ass licking at the end: finally someone who is valuable and takes his job seriously.

Thx man!

Regardless of whether the HH converter gets fixed soon or not, it's refreshing to see CS being taken this seriously and professionally. This is the kind of work makes a company stand out from its average competition.

Also love the idea of favoriting a hand.

I compared Unibet HH with Pokerstars (had it close by), it seems a few formatting changes would do the trick - e.g. button seat line is a few rows lower, hole cards & preflop action is combined on stars, flop and after seem to be a match more or less, with only summary needing one slight change. So I don't think this would be an issue to implement.

Hello,i would like to get my mtt results for this year.

Nickname:IMLUCKBOX
Thx!

By players, for players

Please request this via Support/Live Chat. If you run into any issues, send me a PM about it so I can educate any agents that can't generate the correct report.

Hi Andy,

I just signed up on UniBet. I set up TableTamer for basic hotkeys that are natively included on most sites. F1 for "Fold", F2 for "Check/Call" and F3 for "Bet/Raise."

Due to wrist issues this makes my poker playing experience much more comfortable.

I would like some clarity if this is prohibited. I manually input my bet sizes and use F3 to press the bet button. Given most sites offer this functionality in client, this seems relatively benign IMO.

It would be against the T&Cs as they are written. I'll bring it up with the team because it seems like something that we could just have in the client rather than via 3rd party but I can see fraud concerns because programming a bot to just press F3 sounds easier than programming a bot to try and fake human mouse movements and clicks while it plays.

Hey!

Any plans on opening a merchandise shop in the rewards section?! I bet recreationals would appreciate it. I would definitely buy some stuff if it was possible