Quote:
Originally Posted by cardporn
hi guys,
according to those bot/collusion problems.
I also noticed some suspicous players at the PLO25 & 50 tables for a couple of weeks now. It's kind of hard to keep track due obv reasons...
Does unibet scan if players run 3rd party programs?
What exactly do the do to prevent botting?
PS: i also think ratholing is a bad thing. i dont mind opening with 50 bb but going south after a win and rejoining is lame
Hi,
We would like to point out that the integrity of our games is of utmost importance to us and we undertake extensive reviews through proactive and automatic detection tools, which makes it likely that players are being detected who are trying to break the rules.
I cannot go into details about those methods we use, as being transparent about those would make us easier exploitable.
I can re-assure you however that we do anything possible to avoid bots/chipdumping/collusion or any other form of breaking the rules.
Of course, having players to report suspicious play is of immense help for us to support our already existing procedures.
So, if you have anything suspicious, please contact CS or PM me and I promise we will follow it up.
The ratholing topic is as mentioned, something that we will discuss internally and decide whether changes are needed in that matter or not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wike_
I guess I should share this one aswell after reading about latest bot/collusion problems. Few weeks back I reported 2-3 accounts playing nl100-200 the exact same strategy at the tables when the pools were around 10-15 players. Each account switched names after about 45mins, reset stacks, used betsizes that you have to type in and acted almost instantly. I've reported bots during 10 years of playing and at this point I'm fairly certain when I spot an obvious one.
I never got a reply back from Unibet and I rather keep my action elsewhere because of accounts like this. It's impossible to keep track of these guys if the pool is big and you can't save any data. I figure I'd share this here so regs can keep their eyes open.
Could you please send me the details of this via PM and I'm happy to have a look into this. I know, that all reports are being forwarded to the relevant department and being checked, not all cases go through me, so I'm happy to have a follow-up look at it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyDontCare
I think Unibet have a large number of house bots or/and a rigged RNG. There are alias out there you never see losing one **** pot. Then there also are regs playing who just cant win whatever they do and though they are playing almost perfect. Some say its variance, but not at this point. This is something else. As usual the site, in this case Unibet, dont have to bother because we cant prove it.
The most weird part though is that almost nobody seem to care about this issue. There must be so many break even/small losing regs out there just grinding on with their face stuck in their own ass...
I can just point out again, that we would not benefit at all from this. Poker makes a small percentage of the gross income, the main products are casino and sportsbetting, so risking a whole business to make some extra money through poker does not make any sense to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LektorAJ
I think it can sometimes be the case that they have seen enough to decide, on balance, to boot someone off the site which is completely at their discretion anyway (for example the regulatory regimes have no problem with sites blocking winning sports bettors). That doesn't always mean they have a strong enough case to confiscate client money.
This statement is correct, not every closed account equals the other: closing an account on suspicion without clear evidence, is to our discretion, closing an account and freezing money however has different requirements.